Most likely, the individuals that served on the Grand Jury (if living) are >75 years old. While I completely understand that GJ lists are anonymous, I question why these lists, after almost 48 years have to remain "sealed"; especially if Debbie's case has been reopened and is under "investigation". Black's Law Dictionary (5th Edition) defines Impartial as: "favoring neither; disinterested; treating all alike; unbiased; equitable, fair, and just". Debbie never received the justice she deserved. Were the GJ participants Impartial when they determined that there wasn't enough evidence for Debbie's "case" to go to a jury trial, or is it possible that some of them were "influenced" or "swayed" during the GJ "trial" (e.g. JS friends, relatives, etc.)? The fact that the murder weapon was never found should not have been the sole reason in preventing the case from going to trial. Are the current "investigators" afraid of finding something/someone listed in these sealed GJ lists that might have a negative effect on DPCnty? Potential lawsuits? Any "Sleuth Attorneys" out there? What does it take to get these records opened? Hire an Attorney? Hire a PI? What "connections" did JS and/or his relatives have in the community? More importantly, why does the "legal system" protect the defendant in so many instances, and not the victim?? I'm very frustrated!