I agree. I finally realized why putting this case into winners and losers hurts so much for me. If JA lost, he failed Caylee. And I just don't believe that. He and the rest of the SA fought HARD for that little girl. So hard. They fought when her own family tossed her aside for her murderer mother. And I don't care what the acquittal means, she is and always will be a murderer to me.
It's not their fault the jury couldn't put it together and make a good decision. I do put the entire blame on the jury. THEY are the ones who failed Caylee, not the prosecution. I have watched other cases before too, so it's not like I'm starry eyed or not wanting to see the prosecution in a less than favorable light. But I watched them for three years and a trial, trying to their damnedest to give Caylee justice, and I do not consider that a failure. I only hope that if I ever have to deal with an SA's office, that they fight just as hard as this prosecution did for Caylee.
I really hope Jeff Ashton doesn't consider this a failure. It wasn't, and I won't ever view the prosecution as a bunch of losers like some do here. Baez is NOT and never will be a winner. This case was like the lottery, and he just got plain LUCKY. I felt like the devil danced in the courthouse when that acquittal came down. I still can't get over it.
I do hope Jeff Ashton does address the outcome of the trial in his new book, though. I do want to know what his thoughts are. But I cannot, and will not, ever say this was a failure on the part of the prosecution. They were all Caylee had and gave it their absolute best. They just got unlucky with having the worst jury of all time make the worst decision of all time.