scapa
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2009
- Messages
- 1,717
- Reaction score
- 16,328
Agree.I agree, mistakes happen. I work in healthcare and mistakes happen especially when stressors are high. However, these are professionals and this mistake was correctable because they've had the information for almost 6 years.
I've been in enough ER and clinical situations where stress is high, information is coming in fast and diagnoses and immediate treatment decisions need to be made on the hop -- part of running such systems and working effectively within them is building in and respecting checks and failsafes so that there's enough light in the fog of war to guide responsible decision making and maximize positive results. Colleagues, supervisors, checklists, extra eyes, protocols, orders of analysis, and so on.
I have no doubt info was coming in thick and fast during those early days, and there was immense pressure to stream and manage those tips and evidence quickly and reliably.
But here we have:
- A local man who admits to being on the trails that day and during that time at a point where LE at various highly-emotive PCs are stressing the local knowledge likely required to commit this crime
- Is identified as wearing clothing similar to that of BG in colour, style and even manufacture
- Is a plausible candidate for the man noted by witnesses as moving "with a purpose" (see above)
- Is known to own/ have owned a car resembling the one parked in an unusual way to hide a license plate and be noted as such by more than one witness
- Is clearly a plausible candidate (see above) for the man spotted leaving the trails "muddy and bloody" by witnesses whose accounts can be verified at least in part by video surveillance
- Owns a gun of the kind that might have ejected the unfired shell found between A and L at the crime scene
- Can be brought in at any point to provide testimony as to his whereabouts and activities on the trail that day, stand in a lineup for the various witnesses, provide a voiceprint, gait sample, etc.
- Later, has no explanation for a cartridge from his gun being present at the scene
I totally get the fog of war argument. But how was a local guy who places himself at the scene and fits so many of the criteria for BG NOT investigated with great care early on? How many likely BGs other than him can there have been that he wasn't?
I'm gobsmacked and sad all at once