Notice that it DOESN’T say that any evidence from the search of his car, his clothes, his boots or many other items taken during the search connects RA to the murders.
It’s time to start questioning what this Memorandum omits.
Put your thinking caps on people. Start tearing this apart.
If the Search Warrant didn’t turn up anything to connect RA to the murders then why would the defence go the lengths they have gone to provide an alternate theory and trash LE? If he’s innocent and nothing connects him, what’s the problem?
Hmmmm??? Well maybe it’s because there’s a lot of other stuff omitted in this Memorandum that it going to bury RA.
Tricky Tricky Tricky. Every choice of word, nuance, omission means something.
We all need to take the binders off when we read this “story”.
Time to take notice of every dotted “i” and crossed “t”.
That’s all for now.
MOO JMO IMHO