Justice101
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2013
- Messages
- 2,408
- Reaction score
- 15,932
Agree, the case, whether DNA and/ or significant circumstantial evidence, is there to be made in the open court.
The onus is on the P to prove this - and that is where the need for beyond reasonable doubt plays.
75% of murder cases are solved and successfully prosecuted without DNA evidence.
It's all the other direct evidence that matters just as much like tire tracks, footprints, hair (is a big one), finger prints, call and phone logs, local video footage, duct tape matches, carpet fiber matches.. you name it.