taximama24
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2018
- Messages
- 178
- Reaction score
- 1,545
While LE is not immune to mistakes, I don't tend to blatantly discount what they tell us unless given good reason. For now, LE states BG was wearing a hat and is local (for what its worth, the video posted by @BNA from LE's page maximized on my full screen like no other video has done in the past, and for me at least I thought the hat was quite apparent (down to the style and color). IIRC crime statistics tell us random stranger murder is the least likely scenario (and random stranger double murders are even less likely), and for me I have not seen an argument whose plausibility convinces me that this case would defy those odds so I continue to assume BG is at a minimum at least from the surrounding area to Delphi if not Delphi itself. I tend to think someone does know something and they have not said anything because they are either BG's close family and they feel conflicted about not ever seeing BG outside of a jail visiting room again and doing what's right (a parent would be the most prominent withholder of evidence if this was true), or they are peripherally involved in some way or the reason they know what they know is not on the up and up and they don't want to incriminate themselves in the process. I hope a scientific breakthrough, a slip of the tongue (perhaps a drug or alcohol fueled rant), or a deathbed confession brings closure but by all accounts I don't think as the 3rd anniversary nears anyone could reasonably argue that it hasn't gone cold. My $0.02 is that LE does know who did this but doesn't have the evidence to convict, as was the case for 2yrs with the Rhoden family mass murder in rural Pike County.