"Down the hill" seems to be the elephant in the room. Three interviews by KN now and that phrase is conspicuously absent, not a single mention. I suspect she's banned those three words as a topic of discussion, same as her children. The closest she got was when she described DN's accent with detail, but then put the burden of identifying whether that could be his voice or not on any potential witnesses that might've encountered him on the trail and heard him speak. She knows whether that sounds like DN or not. "Down the hill" not being directly addressed by her is very telling, IMO. (I'd give her the benefit of the doubt that she doesn't want to implicate her husband but she crossed that line in the youtube interview when she said the sketch looked a lot like him and it scared her.) MOO
Speaking out extensively about the accusations for the first time, Katelyn was direct Wednesday: "I'll talk about anything but my kids."
...He also has unmistakable traits, Katelyn said, such as a limp in his walk from one leg being shorter than the other, and a southern drawl that leads him to pronounce words like "right" as "riagh," with a long "I" and indistinct "T." One or both of those things would have stood out to witnesses if they encountered him on the trail, she said.
http://www.jconline.com/story/news/...-nations-involved-delphi-homicides/788115001/
KN gives interview to Greeno.... http://youtube.com/watch?v=XrB3vjyxFsw
*This is a great interview.Answers alot of questions being asked here.
Car,rifle,hatchet,which bridge he was living under...etc..etc
What am I missing? Was there some clarification on why this non-msm, non-LE video was allowed? Please let me know where I can find that.
And as far as this interview being great journalism?
My opinion is different. Both interviewers were unprepared and inarticulate.
The Greeno interview is one post above this one. It has been approved.
Thanks,
Tricia
Yes, I knew, and he admits it in the interview actually - it makes no difference to my opinion in this instance. I would hope every felon in Delphi has been interviewed actually.
Do you have a MSM or LE link to confirm the fact Greeno is a felon? TIA.
You're missing the fact that Tricia ok'd it in a post directly beneath it.What am I missing? Was there some clarification on why this non-msm, non-LE video was allowed? Please let me know where I can find that.
And as far as this interview being great journalism?
My opinion is different. Both interviewers were unprepared and inarticulate.
TY for the link. So he doesn't need a licence in some states. His offences make him qualified to understand DN perhaps, so I guess that is how he got his confidence. JMO.
That's why we are lucky to also have a video and voice of the subject in addition. We don't just have to rely on the sketch.For those of you who believe the sketch is very accurate and think Daniel Nations is the one, I implore you to read this and do some research on the numerous, countless, endless research studies conducted about eyewitnesses and their ability or non ability for memory recall.. and exactly how difficult it is. This particular article throws numbers around of about 9 to 12% accuracy rates . A sketch is not a portrait, it's not a photo. and I also implore you to do some experiments on your own. Go out about town and have one of your friends interact with strangers in public and then go back and question those people and ask them to recall and describe in detail your friend.. and write it down and compare how many differences you'll see. Humans are actually not very good eyewitnesses. And I request you YouTubers to conduct some experiments . Then upload them.. let's see some results. .
(Edit to add that Greeno saw this post on SM and said he is going to conduct this experiment at Purdue and Youtube it)
http://www.philly.com/philly/health...are_police_composite_sketches_.html?mobi=true
What am I missing? Was there some clarification on why this non-msm, non-LE video was allowed? Please let me know where I can find that.
And as far as this interview being great journalism?
My opinion is different. Both interviewers were unprepared and inarticulate.
For those of you who believe the sketch is very accurate and think Daniel Nations is the one, I implore you to read this and do some research on the numerous, countless, endless research studies conducted about eyewitnesses and their ability or non ability for memory recall.. and exactly how difficult it is. This particular article throws numbers around of about 9 to 12% accuracy rates . A sketch is not a portrait, it's not a photo. and I also implore you to do some experiments on your own. Go out about town and have one of your friends interact with strangers in public and then go back and question those people and ask them to recall and describe in detail your friend.. and write it down and compare how many differences you'll see. Humans are actually not very good eyewitnesses. And I request you YouTubers to conduct some experiments . Then upload them.. let's see some results. .
(Edit to add that Greeno saw this post on SM and said he is going to conduct this experiment at Purdue and Youtube it)
http://www.philly.com/philly/health...are_police_composite_sketches_.html?mobi=true
For those of you who believe the sketch is very accurate and think Daniel Nations is the one, I implore you to read this and do some research on the numerous, countless, endless research studies conducted about eyewitnesses and their ability or non ability for memory recall.. and exactly how difficult it is. This particular article throws numbers around of about 9 to 12% accuracy rates . A sketch is not a portrait, it's not a photo. and I also implore you to do some experiments on your own. Go out about town and have one of your friends interact with strangers in public and then go back and question those people and ask them to recall and describe in detail your friend.. and write it down and compare how many differences you'll see. Humans are actually not very good eyewitnesses. And I request you YouTubers to conduct some experiments . Then upload them.. let's see some results. .
(Edit to add that Greeno saw this post on SM and said he is going to conduct this experiment at Purdue and Youtube it)
http://www.philly.com/philly/health...are_police_composite_sketches_.html?mobi=true
For those of you who believe the sketch is very accurate and think Daniel Nations is the one, I implore you to read this and do some research on the numerous, countless, endless research studies conducted about eyewitnesses and their ability or non ability for memory recall.. and exactly how difficult it is. This particular article throws numbers around of about 9 to 12% accuracy rates . A sketch is not a portrait, it's not a photo. and I also implore you to do some experiments on your own. Go out about town and have one of your friends interact with strangers in public and then go back and question those people and ask them to recall and describe in detail your friend.. and write it down and compare how many differences you'll see. Humans are actually not very good eyewitnesses. And I request you YouTubers to conduct some experiments . Then upload them.. let's see some results. .
(Edit to add that Greeno saw this post on SM and said he is going to conduct this experiment at Purdue and Youtube it)
http://www.philly.com/philly/health...are_police_composite_sketches_.html?mobi=true
A few people have mentioned that KN hasn't discussed his voice, maybe police have said not to due to it being evidence?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That could be. Although she discussed the sketch and the pictures on the bridge. The sketch wouldn't be evidence but the pictures on the bridge could be viewed as evidence. But due to the difficulty clearly seeing facial features the BG bridge pics aren't as easily identifiable as the voice, if that makes sense. Regardless, sure seems like someone (whether KN or LE) shut that topic down.