Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So does Lukemeyer (sp?) work in Jim Voyles office?? Or is this a new attorney/new strategy perhaps??
Good point and I would think yes, it probably has a lot to do with her change in tone. To talk with a POI face to face for two hours is so significant.
The first thing that came to mind when I read Lukenmeyer's quote about tainting is that JR possibly gave the name of a suspect.
I'm hoping these interviews with him--and anything they gleaned from it--have a lot to do with how quiet the Spierer's have been.
I'm glad the pressure and scrutiny got to him and he finally talked, but damn why couldn't he have done it earlier?!
Wonder is some kind of deal is being worked out, or has been worked out, to give him immunity from civil litigation so he can talk more freely?
Immunity from civil lit has been mentioned here, but I cannot find this ever being done in a case, and don't even know if it is legally possible...
My speculation was that JR may have provided the family with cause to want to check that area out again for whatever reason. No reason for me to think it means anything more than that, just trying to connect some of the dots.
On Jay Rosenbaum's facebook under Activities and Interests he has listed
Official Lauren Spierer Updates From Her Family. When I first saw this I thought it strange he would list this. I thought he would want to stay as far away from any of this as he could. But now after this story it makes more sense to me. Just hope he has been able to give them info that will help to resolve this.
A few interesting tidbits in this FOX article: the part about immunity and going before a grand jury and then this rather telling statement from "their spokeswoman." This is the first I've heard of such a person.
"Fox59 contacted Rob and Charlene Spierer for a comment about their meeting with Rosenbaum, but they had none. As for Rosenbaum's interview with The Journal News, their spokeswoman said "Sounds like a lawyer wants to get something out there."
http://www.fox59.com/news/wxin-rose...urens-disappearance-20111101,0,4796797.column.
Just so everyone is aware on the entry procedures in SW, there is a breezeway and then an open lobby with elevators and the entry to the garage, there is a call box that is linked to all the apartments, so those without keys (guests, delivery people) call up and a phone rings inside the apartment, then the resident answers and lets you up. Then you can press the button inside the elevator to that floor, otherwise you can't get to a floor without a key card.
Interesting. So what do you make of this? To me it sounds like they're implying that JR's lawyer wants to put out there that he passed a poly and is being cooperative. Sounds to me as though they still don't believe him. Having said that, I agree with an earlier poster....if he's innocent, meeting with them certainly is brazen and stupid.
Bottom line this is all about him so the public will give him a pass and I'm not willing to do that.
I would agree.This guy has had months to go over his story with his lawyer.Which in my opinion is one of the reasons it took him so long to talk to the parents.Also it is not like there is anyone around to dispute his version of the events.I also do not know a PD that would be satisfied with a lie detector test that was given when they did not at least have their own examiner in the room to observe and witness the results.Glad to hear you say that... I had that same feeling... his "interview" hasn't changed anything for me...
I'd like to know why on earth would LE refuse JR's offer to provide DNA? They would have to have been absolutely certain he was not involved--which is obviously not the case--to say nah, we don't need your DNA. Or, was it so early in the case at a point when they mistakenly assumed she must be passed out at someone else's apartment or something like that?