Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
OK really? This isn't a powerball jackpot we're talking about. I've heard all kinds of statistics such as you've presented. Of course the odds are very slim that a stranger will abduct you. But as you place yourself nearer to them, meaning a place they will likely be in, a time they
may be out trolling, and then incapacitate yourself and watch those odds change drastically. All this was directly in place IF Lauren was able to leave and did leave.
Let's take this little boy the other day. By the way, I called the police station to get as many details as would be allowed. He had been missing only 12 minutes before the police had him safe. Time: middle of the day with people all around. Place:upscale neighborhood Chance of inebriated people trolling the neighborhood: very slim. Not really a place that someone would be trolling to snatch a kid, but not impossible. All in all, his chance of a stranger abduction was low, and if so, the police could have possibly run the person down on the spot with fast descriptions from the many people around who would have seen the abduction. Police response was excellent.
I totally agree that her friends could be involved in foul play. They are
telling different stories, but as we have agreed, take out the riff raff and the stories are pretty much the same. This could also be the level of drug abuse each one is responsible for. Are they just using or selling? If selling, then they are not going to go into that at all unless they are forced to. Their lawyers are probably telling the LE that when they have enough evidence to charge their client and arrest them, that's when they will tell EVERYTHING they know.
Until then, no more talking.
Look at what we alone have done with the info that they have given. We have tried and convicted them. I don't feel sorry for them. I think they deserve the scrutiny and bad feelings they are getting just because they didn't make sure she got home. But, let's play hot potato for a minute. Plenty of other people had the chance to rein Lauren in but let her go, especially those no good roommates of her's. No one insisted that she stay safely back at SmallWood. People wonder how the altercation got started in the 5th floor lobby near her apt. Well, let's see, I'm willing to bet that HT and BW have something to do with that. Somehow, they come off as victims. This time Lauren went too far my arse, they were up to their eyebrows right along with her and were probably waiting for her to get back. When she didn't show, they should have called the police immediately, IMO, MOO, MHO.
If I remember correctly, BW was back home in NY when this all went down. She was even interviewed with another girl BL who mentioned she was leaving to head to Bloomington to help search after the interview was being filmed. HT maybe, BW I doubt.
One more thing. A witness did indeed stop to help Lauren that night. Yet she did not call 911. Why not? A. Corey Rossman is such a magical charmer that he convinced her she did not see what she saw with her own eyes. B. What she saw was not as severe as is being distorted on this board.
All that being said, given the fact that Lauren already is missing, you can look at the complicated statistics I mention above or the simple and real odds. 50/50. She was abducted by a stranger or she wasn't. In Laurens case, it really is just that simple.
Distorted? Lauren's condition that night is one of the only things about this case that has been documented by enough different sources that it seems pretty clear.
To me, what speaks volumes is that a witness was concerned enough to intervene. Living in an area with a lot of frat houses and students, I can say that no one would bat an eye at a wasted girl stumbling around at night -- there would have to be bigger cause for concern.
The witness did see bigger cause for concern, and the condition she described has been reiterated by the people who saw the videos and other witnesses. Lauren was intoxicated enough to be described by different people as being totally incapacitated, she couldn't walk, no one heard her talk, she fell several times, once without even putting up her hands to block the fall (this is obviously what VV is referring to, she didn't make that part up), and at last sighting sounds like she was at best semi-conscious when she was being dragged, limp over Corey Rossman's shoulder.
When the witness asked if Lauren was okay, CR told her everything was under control and he was taking care of the situation. I don't thing a person would have to be super charming in this situation, only sober enough to give an answer that they were a friend who was already helping the person and look capable of doing so. My guess is that most people in this situation would not intervene further. Ever watch "what would you do" on CNN? They usually have to go to huge lengths to get anyone to react to the scenarios they set up, like having one actor who pretends to be a bystander, roping the real bystanders in -- That's because most people, no matter what the situation, walk right by. When in doubt, people usually opt on the side of not getting involved.
I am disputing how much of her condition was caused by drugs and alcohol verses her Long QT. That is important because if it was QT? She might have snapped out of it somewhat. However what really rubs me wrong is the term face slam. We do not know if she collapsed or fell head over heels. Big difference. And, her fall was certainly not the last sighting. There were several more cameras in the 2 alleys after 10th and College Apartments.
But having 2 choices doesn't mean the odds are 50/50...?
The usefulness of stats is pretty limited, but they are a good reminder that all situations are not equally likely.
But wait, just like the inconsistencies in the in MB stories of how LS got over to JR's just how does she get to JR's (especially if it involves going down a set of stairs and then back up another set of stairs) without proving that she can walk? Would that not be quite a bit more of a "walk test" than what he could give her inside of his apt? This leads me to believe that JR knew she could not walk, and so he had to come up with a story to explain that she could walk because others very likely may have seen her falling down. But if he knew she walked down and then back up stairs from CR/MB's to his place that should be proof enough that she could walk unassisted.
MB did not say he carried LS to JR's, and JR did not say he carried LS to his place. CR was supposedly in bed. So, they are both saying LS walked from CR/MB's to JR's. So then why do you need a walk test?
When talking about statistics we have to disregard chance statistics in this case. What I mean by this is that we cannot say " the odds are __% that a person will be abducted". We have to add in the variables. The biggest variable in this case is that she is still missing almost 2 yrs later. So the statistics that give us the "powerball" like chances of being abducted are not relevant here. We would need to know the statistics that tell us the chances that a person missing for 2 yrs was abducted. Does this make sense?
Really weird that HT is a topic of discussion tonight. Just this morning I had an epiphany that she KNOWS what happened. The fact that she said "Lauren went a little too far this time" says that she knows exactly what happened. WHY can't the police bring some of these POIs and even HT in for questioning? I don't understand why they can't question these guys/gals and get their stories individually and see if someone will crack. I honestly think HT knows what happened and possibly even where she is. HT is obviously covering for JR. Another thing I don't understand is why everyone is being quiet. Obviously CR and ZO aren't friends, sk why wouldn't they try and point the finger at each other? Why are all of them being quiet? That boggles my mind!
When talking about statistics we have to disregard chance statistics in this case. What I mean by this is that we cannot say " the odds are __% that a person will be abducted". We have to add in the variables. The biggest variable in this case is that she is still missing almost 2 yrs later. So the statistics that give us the "powerball" like chances of being abducted are not relevant here. We would need to know the statistics that tell us the chances that a person missing for 2 yrs was abducted. Does this make sense?
Really weird that HT is a topic of discussion tonight. Just this morning I had an epiphany that she KNOWS what happened. The fact that she said "Lauren went a little too far this time" says that she knows exactly what happened. WHY can't the police bring some of these POIs and even HT in for questioning? I don't understand why they can't question these guys/gals and get their stories individually and see if someone will crack. I honestly think HT knows what happened and possibly even where she is. HT is obviously covering for JR.