OEJ
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2011
- Messages
- 1,616
- Reaction score
- 119
OEJ,
tank your for partly agreeing with my view of the killers. But, could you , please, provide the name of the most ruthless child killer(s) who blanched?
I do not know if I could consider assault of JonBenet`s body with an object could be classified as sexual. They made no biological or even tactile contact with her. They forfully inserted an object, and took a picture. That`s was the main reason- for finial humiliating pictures. For memorabilia, other than picture they took Nothing, neither from Jonbenet, nor from the house. And Jonbenet had several new pieces of gold on her. It tells me they were not cheap deranged drunkards or crack heads, who though that $118,000 somewhere in the range next to $1 million, those deranged cheap criminals would grab couple of gold items from the body, why not? Or something from the house? They took nothing. Instead, killers took pictures. Including with her hands tied up. Object and hands tied up were done for pictures. I do not know if humiliation of a body was for sexual gratification for them. I think for victory. I`ve already explained my theory that it was a political act. And it`s just my opinion.
I made a mistake in an earlier reply to this post. I missed that tovarisch asked for the name of a vicious child killer. The name I gave was not a child killer.
As far as the biological material left behind, my understanding is that there was DNA probably left from saliva on the vaginal swab. I don't know that sexual assault was the motivation but there was a sexual assault, and some of the most bizarre murders happen because there was a sexual fantasy or a paraphilia of some kind in play. It is also easily possible that a retaliatory urge coincided with a sexual urge. Odd, but true.