I`m afraid I became more and more resembling my parrot, who is on my profile picture. But being a follower upper, I feel obliged to answer the questions and the answers are the repetition of previously said by me.
I want to repeat that not everything in the world is happening because of money. Mostly, but not everything. There is a war of IDAELS is going on, and will never stop. If to take out of equation money, my theory will come out more clearly.
The best example of the not everything about money is right here, on the websleuths`s site. People have spent years of their lives, sleepless nights, time for research and discussion PURE OUT of IDEA of finding the justice for the innocent child. Ideas could be very infectious. I`m infected myself and I don`t know how to find serenity for my mind. It`s been years I was thinking about JonBenet.
IDEAS could be very infectious and motivating. This is my point. It could be wrong unhuman twisted ideas, but somebody who is true believer in it would go with the wrong doing for it. Mostly, it`s a strong religious twisted ideals. That`s who I see behind the weird Ransom`s note language. They claimed proudly a victory, they hinted why it`s done- they do not respect the country.
Why to ask me about of statistics of repeated attempts of kidnapping if I`m clearly put in my theory that I don`t believe in kidnapping or ransom money for one minute. What should I answer.
Do I need to repeat that I believer in forensics evidence and there were evidence of more than one killer? Shoeprints, multiple DNA on the garrote, fibers of different colors, unsoursed.
Nothing could shake me, unless reports are shown that every evidence soured and explained, pointing to the family.
Why they never killed anybody else? Do we know they had not? It could be that they are living in other countries now, got their diplomas and gone. They said they are foreigners to this country. I wish DNA searching could be extended to international database. They could be grown out of the S.T.B.C, they could split. They could get the pass to another terrorist group with this crime.
Why 118,000 was put in the ransom. Not only this, they hinted they knew Mr. Ramsey business, they knew about Ramsey not being in the house on the evening of Dec 25, when the first of them entered the house, to make finial plans. The knew there was no security alarm. They had the key. They knew a lot about the family, and they put it to be known, to show the power, you are not only fat cat around. They did not mind, their alibi was strong, they pre-planned their crime for a long time. They knew it would be hard to find them, as a faction they were underground, and on the surface they were normal young people. They were confident.
Molestation. I will answer once and for all. Even Steve Thomas did not dare connect the dots between molestation and the murder. He had mention molestation in his book but he never proclaimed killing as a motivation.
Forensic evidence suggests it was not a sexual crime.
The twice bigger vaginal opening; I`m not a doctor, but what comes to my mind- if the object forcefully inserted in the dead body, is it possible that the dead body`s muscles return to the original shape, or it would remain forcefully opened? Erosion of the hymen of result of the same forceful insertion? Unproved. The most damaging out of all signs of previous abuse FOR ME personally it is vaginal inflammation, because it would take time prior to the crime to develop. It`s a big red flag, but
there is inflammation caused by sexual decease and there is other non-sexual reasons, like very very bad training of wiping, to almost of non-existing training. Where is the report? Where is the report of sexual bacteria found, easily as 1-2-3, on the vaginal walls? It would be right there, the bacteria, show me the report.
