my opinion .... more INSULT to CAYLEE MARIE ANTHONY!
more of the lies that her murder was an "accident", or intentional drowning by George
more excuses for the horrible verdict - lazy jurors and Aphrodite to say there was not enough evidence to convict
all done for the hope of ratings and future interviews for Aphrodite
no thought to justice for CAYLEE
Lazy jurors are the key words in ur post. How could they sit on a circumstantial case for 6 weeks and then not ask for or look at any evidence. They werent even taking notes for pete's sake
Aphrodite did not talk about jurors being bullied into changing their votes in the jury deliberation room. I believe that definitely happened.
Jurors if you were bullied into going along with the not guilty verdict please speak out through the media now. Please do not disrespect yourself or Caylee by taking money to speak out. Just do the right thing and tell what happened in that jury room.
We know that Juror # 2 Raymond Screen, was the last hold out for voting not guilty.
Who were the 2 jurors who wanted to vote GUILTY of first-degree murder, but were pressured into changing their vote in the jury deliberation room?
Which juror(s) did the bullying and pressuring to vote not guilty?
Who were the 6 jurors who voted to convict of aggravated manslaughter, but were pressured into changing their vote to not guilty on that charge?
Jeff Ashton wrote in his book, about juror # 7 Kimberly A. Kimball : She was the only juror I recall who showed much emotion throughout the trial, and at the end of it all, when the clerk read the verdict, she was the only one who shed a tear.
She worked in an occupation related to children or child welfare she has been an office manager for non-profit organization and the accounting dept. of a nursing home in Atlanta and the fundraising department of a childrens hospital in Atlanta.
*Currently works for juvenile justice and child welfare division in the corporate offices as administrative assistant (has no contact with juveniles, etc).
Her mother was an estate lawyer in Florida, about to retire.
She dated a State Attorney in Florida.
Says she is a CNN junkie.
Doesnt have a Facebook, Myspace, etc. but has a LinkedIn account (rarely uses it).
The Defense wanted her dismissed from jury selection but the Judge denied it, and the Defense did not use one of their strikes on her.
Jurors please speak out and tell what happened!
Please do not try to make any money off of Caylees murder.
1 Joan G. Meier
2 Raymond L. Screen
3 Jennifer Ford
4 Linda F. Bills
5 Harriet B. White
6 Brian P. Berling
7 Kimberly A. Kimball
8 Kathleen A. Nighland
9 James P. Kearns
10 Ronald H. Robertson
11 David W. Angelo
12 Mary L. Fuhr
something else I was wondering being that we r on the jurors. Jose Baez has Cindy come up and admitt to the jurors that she did the search for chloroform but then in his closing arguments he tells the jury that Ricardo Morales posted the chloroform picture on his my space and being that ICA was dating him that she became curious as to what he was talking about and thats why she searched chloroform on the internet and what I dont get is how they didnt even question why he was giving them 2 different reasons why chloroform was searched on the computer. And to make it even more boggling is if they believed yeah thats why she searched for it on the in ternet then wouldn't she have searched what is chloroform and not how to make it???????
I know this may belong in another thread but I had to bring it up. I just found this online it was wriiten in JB book of lies lol... We drove around, and I had no idea where we were, but Casey did," Baez wrote. "'You know about three blocks up on the left, do you know who lives there?' she asked. 'Zanny?' I blurted out. We cracked up laughing. 'Don't make me punch you,' she said." After reading that how can anyone who cared 1 ounce about justice for Caylee not get upset about that.. them joking about it boils my blood. I hope some jurors have read that and are kicking themseves for their ridiculous verdict..
IMHO JB did this all through out the trial & they still bought everything he said anyway. Just like Caylee's death was an accident but GA really murdered her.
Kronk stole Caylee & put her in the woods, no wait, he found the remains & took them home to put duct tape over her face, but wait there wasn't any duct tape on her face, it was attached to the bag from GA burying Caylee like he did the pets.
I could go on & on but I'm getting dizzy.
I ask myself everyday how 1 juror could ever buy any of this let alone 12.
It all stinks to High Heaven!
Yep, yep, yep, I agree with everything you said. :seeya:So many of us wonder the exact same thing ... how did all 12 buy what he was selling? The prosecution never waivered. Their opening was consistent with their evidence which was consistent with their closing. Baez was all over the place, and the points he was trying to make contradicted each other. All the talking heads, defense attorney's included, were saying that jury's always hold attorney's accountable for what they say they are going to prove, and an attorney should never say something in opening statments that he can't back up. Not only did he fail to back up what he said, but his closing arguments were different from what he said in opening. But this jury had nothing but praise for him, and were very critical of the prosecutors. Totally backwards! Those of us who are rational, reasonable thinkers are baffled. It just seems as though their minds were made up from day 1. No note taking during the State's case, very little deliberations, no evidence reviewed, and no questions to the judge. Then, a vote from 12-2 to 6-6 to 12-0 in 11 hours! Something went on in that jury room, and I hope someone's conscience gets to them, and they spill the beans.