Romulus
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2015
- Messages
- 3,562
- Reaction score
- 5,226
Hi I could not miss here in this discussion; my opinion on the case is quite unconventional: I believe that the killer is one of the sardinians, but not of the Vinci or Mele circle, but of the superior Sardinians those of the Anonima Sarda crime syndacate; a Sardinian shepherd kidnapper who died in 1998 who knew both the Vinci and the Mele who were a very good friend of Francesco Vinci; one who knew both how to shoot and how to use a knife; one who apparently had several sexual disorders; I also think, contrary to many, that there has never been a passing of a weapon; I also think he may have been part of a group of people, not necessarily alone. In any case, I believe that the key to the mystery is the double crime of 68.
The person that I believe is the killer or at least one of the killers gravitated and was part of that environment and frequented people like Mario Sale, Giovanni Farina, people with whom it was dangerous to joke, but apparently knew Francesco Vinci too. he seems to have been the driver, and he was allegedly someone who had sexual problems, in short, a Sardinian connecting the Vinci, Mele and the Company; in addition to this he seems to have been an informer for the Florence public prosecutor's office, in particular for Vigna; so to speak, he was not a Vinci-style delinquent or someone like Stefano Mele, here we are talking about high-ranking delinquency, which goes beyond simple theft of livestock. In those years and in those areas (especially Calvana) there was a strong presence of Sardinian immigrants, shepherds, bricklayers, and criminals of all kinds; the Sardinian bar located in Prato is a point of reference and aggregation for the island's immigrants and it cannot be excluded that the future Monster or the monsters are Sardinian; and in those years there were kidnappings in Tuscany by the Company. Finally, I believe that there have been important coverings, cover-ups, disappearances of vital finds for the investigation, precisely because, in my opinion, important characters were involved, perhaps also linked to investigative environments.
I believe that the key to solving the mystery is 1968; for me the first double crime is of the Sardinians, Francesco Vinci and Salvatore could not bear that she, Barbara Locci went her way with a Sicilian and they decide to kill her: so either they do the crime, but I see it hard because both were still in some way controlled and shadowed see Salvatore Vinci and in any case there is bad blood between them and they must never agree, or they charge someone, but who could it be? Pacciani? Vigilant? No, I don't see them just to assign someone, the Sardinians are used to washing dirty clothes in the family, so maybe they hire someone they know, there were many Sardinians in Tuscany in those years, the anonymous kidnappings raged, in short, let's talk of bandits, not cheap sheep, people accustomed to killing and using the knife well: from here then we can think of any way: either the one who committed the crime kept the gun and continued this damned gun changed hands and someone else continued the crimes; I believe that instead whoever committed the first double crime was kept the gun and continued until 1985, and has a very specific name; I underline that this person seems to have received facilities from the prosecutor's office (he collaborated on the kidnappings, giving information) and was in some way preserved, protected; once you get to 1985, seeing that the circle is tightening more and more, he stops killing, makes the gun and knife disappear and leaves the scene forever.
The person that I believe is the killer or at least one of the killers gravitated and was part of that environment and frequented people like Mario Sale, Giovanni Farina, people with whom it was dangerous to joke, but apparently knew Francesco Vinci too. he seems to have been the driver, and he was allegedly someone who had sexual problems, in short, a Sardinian connecting the Vinci, Mele and the Company; in addition to this he seems to have been an informer for the Florence public prosecutor's office, in particular for Vigna; so to speak, he was not a Vinci-style delinquent or someone like Stefano Mele, here we are talking about high-ranking delinquency, which goes beyond simple theft of livestock. In those years and in those areas (especially Calvana) there was a strong presence of Sardinian immigrants, shepherds, bricklayers, and criminals of all kinds; the Sardinian bar located in Prato is a point of reference and aggregation for the island's immigrants and it cannot be excluded that the future Monster or the monsters are Sardinian; and in those years there were kidnappings in Tuscany by the Company. Finally, I believe that there have been important coverings, cover-ups, disappearances of vital finds for the investigation, precisely because, in my opinion, important characters were involved, perhaps also linked to investigative environments.
I believe that the key to solving the mystery is 1968; for me the first double crime is of the Sardinians, Francesco Vinci and Salvatore could not bear that she, Barbara Locci went her way with a Sicilian and they decide to kill her: so either they do the crime, but I see it hard because both were still in some way controlled and shadowed see Salvatore Vinci and in any case there is bad blood between them and they must never agree, or they charge someone, but who could it be? Pacciani? Vigilant? No, I don't see them just to assign someone, the Sardinians are used to washing dirty clothes in the family, so maybe they hire someone they know, there were many Sardinians in Tuscany in those years, the anonymous kidnappings raged, in short, let's talk of bandits, not cheap sheep, people accustomed to killing and using the knife well: from here then we can think of any way: either the one who committed the crime kept the gun and continued this damned gun changed hands and someone else continued the crimes; I believe that instead whoever committed the first double crime was kept the gun and continued until 1985, and has a very specific name; I underline that this person seems to have received facilities from the prosecutor's office (he collaborated on the kidnappings, giving information) and was in some way preserved, protected; once you get to 1985, seeing that the circle is tightening more and more, he stops killing, makes the gun and knife disappear and leaves the scene forever.
