Ask Tommy Lynn Sells. BTK. Etc. It's been done...
Neither Sells nor Rader sexually assaulted their victims.
They did murder them in their houses, though. Rader specifically was a stalker.
Ask Tommy Lynn Sells. BTK. Etc. It's been done...
Neither Sells nor Rader sexually assaulted their victims.
You can adjust your own handwriting, you can't adjust science. I couldn't recognize most of my family's handwriting if they changed a thing. It's not like this note was like T. Kazenski's (SP) manifesto. It was a letter with phrases from movies.
Wrong.
I'd recognize almost immediately the handwriting of immediate family and close friends so your argument won't work about that -- it's 50/50. It is likely that someone, out of a group of many, would recognize something about the note writer simply by the way it looked and read, including the QDEs who couldn't eliminate Patsy.
What happened to make the intruder morph from a kidnapper to a murderer?
They didn't simply kill her a leave her, the wiped her down, redressed her, wrapped her in a blanket and stashed her in the WC. Why would they do all that?
So I just can't get my head wrapped around this theory:
The intruder skillfully and boldly enters an occupied home to kidnap a young girl (and does not do the safer method of abducting her in a semi-public area like in a playground, coming-or-going to school, while outside walking, playing with other kids, etc etc). This intruder has no worries about the father waking up and using perhaps a gun on him during his intruding.
....and this intruder intends to kidnap JBR to some other location so he/she writes a ransom note
....but then he/she decides to sexually assault the young girl while he is in the family's home with adults there and (but decides against waiting to do this in the "comfort" and safety of his own place) and inflicts severe damage
....and then kills her in the process so he cleans up some things, takes some things, disposes of some things
....and yet, and yet
leaves the ransome note behind. Very risky leaving anything else about considering that JBR was dead and additional evidence could be garnered of a pointless ransom note is highly risky.
Simply preposterous!
moo
So I just can't get my head wrapped around this theory:
The intruder skillfully and boldly enters an occupied home to kidnap a young girl (and does not do the safer method of abducting her in a semi-public area like in a playground, coming-or-going to school, while outside walking, playing with other kids, etc etc). This intruder has no worries about the father waking up and using perhaps a gun on him during his intruding.
....and this intruder intends to kidnap JBR to some other location so he/she writes a ransom note
....but then he/she decides to sexually assault the young girl while he is in the family's home with adults there and (but decides against waiting to do this in the "comfort" and safety of his own place) and then goes against what he wrote in the ransome note and inflicts severe damage to the kidnapped victim (?) before he's had the chance to collect money
....and then he/she kills her in the process so he cleans up some things, takes some things, disposes of some things
....and yet, and yet
leaves the ransom note behind. Very risky leaving anything else about considering that JBR was dead and additional evidence could be garnered of a pointless ransom note is highly risky.
Simply preposterous!
moo
All this is possible, But I think it most likely that the note was left because it was put there first. Before he even had JBR. I think he left it and when whatever happened happened, He could not help himself, Or something went wrong, He just exited and did not return upstairs that place he left the note.
Isn't the kitchen right near the stairs?
Wasn't this intruder so careful as to not leave DNA but yet forgets that he/she wrote a lengthy and "flowing" ransom note?
The kidnapper forgot that his original intention was the $118,000.?
And sometimes the crime scene is just what it looks like.
The Killer left DNA. There is unknown DNA on JBR until that is sourced It can not be ruled out as the killer.
I don't know if that was the killer's intention. None of us do. Not until we know who it is.
I'll agree the Killer left DNA. Yep, I think she did. :wink: