Japan - 9.0 Earthquake-Tsunami -Reactor Status, 2011 #6

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
These measurements confuse the daylights out of me, especially after reading the comments after the article. Nevertheless, for your reading pleasure, I give you:

http://enenews.com/700-pcikg-found-soil-base-sierra-nevada-mountains-according-preliminary-data

Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Accident Monitoring, Taylor Wilson at University of Nevada, Reno, April 17, 2011:

To test different types of Soil, a sample was collected from the base of the Sierra Nevadas. This soil is less sandy, and more organic, which would suggest a higher coefficient for sorption for Radionuclides. It also has more moisture content. The data is still preliminary however, there appears to be ~700 pCi/kg or ~26 Bq/kg of Cs137. Which is ~30 times the amount present in Valley soil.

This is very unsettling for me-- as I live at the base of the Sierras, on the western side. Reno, of course, is eastern-- he was not clear which "valley" he collected the sample from. If it's the eastern side, then I'd say the western side is even more polluted, as the rain falls on the western slopes. :mad:

Plus I'll add-- we still have the majority of the Sierra snow pack yet to run off...which feeds orchards and crops that are sold all over the country.
 
http://theintelhub.com/2011/04/21/japan-nuclear-radiation-detected-in-drinking-water-in-20-us-cities/

The U.S. Federal Government reports that Japan nuclear radiation has now been detected in the drinking water in 20 US cities.

Today the EPA has updated the list with new results and the number of US cities where radiation has been found in the drinking water has grown to 20 US cities. Here is a complete list as of April, 21st 2011.

Boise, ID
Chattanooga, TN
Cincinnati, OH
Columbia, PA
Columbus, OH
Denver, CO
Detroit, MI
East Liverpool, OH
Harrisburg, PA
Helena, MT
Los Angeles, CA
Muscle Shoals, AL
Niagara Falls, NY
Oak Ridge, TN
Painesville, OH
Philadelphia, PA
Pittsburg, PA
Richland, WA
Trenton, NJ
Watertown, NJ

It should be noted that the EPA only appears to be testing for radioactive iodine, which is easier to downplay because of the 8 day half-life outside of the human body.

There are no results being posted for Cesium or other radioactive isotopes. It is unknown if they are not testing for Cesium, if none was detected, or if they are simply not posting the results.

Be advised however, the half-life of Iodine in the human body is 100 days meaning it can still give a radioactive dose for years before it decays entirely.
 
Japan Expands Evacuation Zone Around Nuclear Plant
April 22, 2011

http://www.voanews.com/english/news...Around-Fukushima-Daiichi-Plant-120445924.html

An evacuation advisory for areas near the crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant was widened on Friday because of concerns about long-term radiation exposure. The move comes a day after Japan began legally enforcing a 20-kilometer exclusion zone around the power station.

The new advisory covers several towns northeast of the mandatory exclusion zone. Residents have been asked to leave the area within the next month...

(article continues)


The article doesn't have many details.
 
How absolutely devastating for those families that call that region home... many families have farmed there for hundreds of years. :(
 
Good morning, all.

Happy Earth Day.

c010.gif
 
Radiation and Health: The Aftershocks of Japan's Nuclear Disaster

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/susan-blumenthal/radiation-and-health-the-_b_851724.html

The first part of this article is a little redundant for someone who's been following the disaster, but the second part has some valuable information. jmo

Great article, can serve as a primer on the entire crisis AND as a health warning. I note that cesium-137 (found in the Sierra Nevada soil) has a half life of 30 years!
 
[video=youtube;mjYIzxRhGJw]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjYIzxRhGJw[/video]
Evacuation area officially expanded
snip-
The Japanese government has announced the official expansion of the evacuation zone around the troubled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant to selected areas beyond the existing 20-kilometer radius. Residents of the new areas are being asked to evacuate by the end of May.

Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano said on Friday that the government made the designation since residents there could be exposed to cumulative radiation levels of 20 millisieverts or more per year if they stay.

The 5 new municipalities are located to the northwest of the plant and are more than 20 kilometers from it.

Edano said that due to the possible impact on residents' heath, the government is now urging them to evacuate within about a month.




http://www3.nhk.or.jp/daily/english/22_20.html
 
Tobacco farmers request damages from TEPCO
Friday, April 22, 2011 17:42 +0900 (JST)

http://www3.nhk.or.jp/daily/english/22_27.html

Tobacco farmers in Fukushima Prefecture are seeking damages from Tokyo Electric Power Company after losing this year's crop due to radiation leaks from the damaged Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant...

...TEPCO Managing Director Naomi Hirose apologized for causing so much trouble and said that the utility will study details about the government's guidelines on compensation after they are issued...

...Terai says that economic losses for tobacco farmers in Fukushima are estimated to be about 60 million dollars.



O, the irony!
a095.gif
 
Ukraine raises $785m to seal Chernobyl under new 'shell'

World governments pledge millions for the construction of a 20,000-tonne steel arch to prevent further radiation leaks............................





The French prime minister, François Fillon, said Fukushima evoked memories of Chernobyl: "More than ever, our responsibility is to join together our efforts to limit the consequences of such disasters and to prepare for the future."

Mikhail Gorbachev, president of the Soviet Union at the time of the Chernobyl disaster and now head of the environment group Green Cross International, used the occasion of the 25th anniversary to say nuclear power was not the answer to the world's energy problems or to climate change.

In a statement he said: "Nuclear power has been presented as a financially sound, economically efficient, clean and safe solution that will bring about energy security and drive economic growth. Recently, the so-called 'nuclear renaissance' has hitched a free ride on the back of the need to find low-carbon solutions to the climate crisis.

"The bottom line on the economics of nuclear power is that it simply does not add up. That is why private investment is wisely focusing on better alternatives.

"It is necessary to realise that nuclear power is not a panacea, as some observers allege, for energy sufficiency or climate change. Its cost effectiveness is also exaggerated, as its real cost does not account for hidden expenses.

"In the United States, for example, direct subsidies to nuclear energy amounted to $115bn between 1947 and 1999, with an additional $145bn in indirect subsidies. In contrast, subsidies to wind and solar energy, combined over this same period, totalled only $5.5bn."

But Mohamed ElBaradei, former head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, said: "Today, nuclear power is the only real alternative to fossil fuel as a source of a reliable supply."

He acknowledged that confidence in atomic energy had taken a severe blow after the tsunami-triggered disaster at Fukushima. "Fukushima represents a potentially significant setback for nuclear power," he told participants at the forum, although he stressed that confidence would be "re-established in due course", then added: "Chernobyl and Fukushima should be shown to be aberrations."



http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/apr/19/ukraine-funding-chernobyl-arch
 
Tokyo Takes Over PR From Plant Operator

Quote: Tokyo's intervention in Tepco's public-relations arm came after several briefings that sowed confusion, with Tepco issuing statements on radiation levels that it later rescinded or revised, or that appeared to catch Tokyo by surprise at briefings often held at around the same time of day.

"We have decided to make announcements as unified as possible," said Banri Kaieda, minister of Economy, Trade and Industry, which oversees Japan's Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency, or NISA.

Mr. Kaieda said the new united briefings, which would include representatives from Tepco as well as officials from different government agencies, would begin Monday.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703387904576278511723462094.html
 
http://theintelhub.com/2011/04/21/japan-nuclear-radiation-detected-in-drinking-water-in-20-us-cities/

The U.S. Federal Government reports that Japan nuclear radiation has now been detected in the drinking water in 20 US cities.

Today the EPA has updated the list with new results and the number of US cities where radiation has been found in the drinking water has grown to 20 US cities. Here is a complete list as of April, 21st 2011.

Boise, ID
Chattanooga, TN
Cincinnati, OH
Columbia, PA
Columbus, OH
Denver, CO
Detroit, MI
East Liverpool, OH
Harrisburg, PA
Helena, MT
Los Angeles, CA
Muscle Shoals, AL
Niagara Falls, NY
Oak Ridge, TN
Painesville, OH
Philadelphia, PA
Pittsburg, PA
Richland, WA
Trenton, NJ
Watertown, NJ

It should be noted that the EPA only appears to be testing for radioactive iodine, which is easier to downplay because of the 8 day half-life outside of the human body.

There are no results being posted for Cesium or other radioactive isotopes. It is unknown if they are not testing for Cesium, if none was detected, or if they are simply not posting the results.

Be advised however, the half-life of Iodine in the human body is 100 days meaning it can still give a radioactive dose for years before it decays entirely.

This might be a stupid question,but why just these cities? Is it because they aren't being tested elsewhere? If Niagara Falls has radiation,why doesn't Buffalo?
 
[video=youtube;ahmuvt8bC4A]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ahmuvt8bC4A[/video]
 
This might be a stupid question,but why just these cities? Is it because they aren't being tested elsewhere? If Niagara Falls has radiation,why doesn't Buffalo?
Not a stupid question at all, hockeymom - what is stupid, is, "I don't know" is the best answer I've got.
 
Waterproof camera set to probe pool in No. 4

Quote: The camera and other sensors will be attached to a crane truck that has been equipped with a long pumping hose to keep the pool filled so the fuel rods don't burn up and spread more radiation. Tepco said the spent fuel rods are probably 2 to 3 meters under the water now.

Tepco wants to see if the 140 tons of water it's injecting every two days is sufficient to offset evaporation and leaks and keep the rods submerged.

http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20110423a7.html
 
Waterproof camera set to probe pool in No. 4

Quote: The camera and other sensors will be attached to a crane truck that has been equipped with a long pumping hose to keep the pool filled so the fuel rods don't burn up and spread more radiation. Tepco said the spent fuel rods are probably 2 to 3 meters under the water now.

Tepco wants to see if the 140 tons of water it's injecting every two days is sufficient to offset evaporation and leaks and keep the rods submerged.

http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20110423a7.html
Oh my God, probably under 2 to 3 meters of water? Tepco wants to see if? Heaven help us all.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
96
Guests online
1,970
Total visitors
2,066

Forum statistics

Threads
599,466
Messages
18,095,731
Members
230,862
Latest member
jusslikeme
Back
Top