Could you provide some supporting information for your statement? For instance, how do Zen or Shinto-influenced Buddhism practices address the issue of a criminal seeking refuge within temple grounds (that is not allowing it), compared to Theravada Buddhist temples in Thailand?
As of recent estimates, there are approximately 40,000-50,000 Buddhist monks in Japan. Out of them, 10-20% live on-site. The data is current, but I would assume that in 2000, the percentage was no less, and likely more.
Large Zen temples, such as those in the Rinzai and Soto schools, may have around 10-30 monks living on-site full time. Examples also include Eiheiji Temple and Sojiji Temple, which are major training monasteries with large resident communities. Shingon temples, like Koyasan, can also have a number of resident monks often in the range of 10-20 monks. Medium-sized temples may have 3-10 monks living full time, and small temples 1-3 monks. Training monasteries associated with specific Buddhist schools often have more monks living on-site due to their rigorous training programs. In Tokyo, Senso-ji Temple in Asakusa and Zojo-ji Temple in Minato have 3-10 monks living on-site. Setagaya hosts 4 temples with monks living there, in small numbers though.
"Everything that can be invented has been invented." - Thomas Edison, 19th century.
What happens if a man comes to a Japanese Buddhist temple and explains that he’d like to spend a few days, fasting, meditating and keeping silence? I’d expect them just to show him a quiet place and let him be. In fact, most monasteries would respond the same way. They’d probably just leave some water for him and that’s it. In this cases, natural human curiosity gives way to respect for a person that has made a vow, or is guided by some higher idea, whatever way you put it.
Now, if a professional moonlights as a priest, he comes home and reads newspapers. But for monks who live in the temple, the latest news might come with a 1-2 days of delay, and in the meantime, he’d be gone.
I don’t think that it is the highest possibility, but it may not be totally unlikely. I don’t think we have to compare different paths of Buddhism, because tbh, in a Christian monastery, the reaction would be exactly the same. There is no privacy more respected than between a man and his God.
Today, I am thinking that skateboarding later than the most at the Setagaya park is a possibility. He had some board tape in his bag and he wasn’t remembered by other boarders, meaning, he was not the part of their group. I looked up different posts about evening skating - many people find it calming; I don’t quite buy it but I think that 1) perhaps, our perpetrator is nocturnal; 2) he is not the best skateboarder, so training alone would be easier; 3) many mentioned that in Tokyo, the police would pick nighttime skateboarders unless they skate in the park; 4) the park, as many posted here, was well-lit. 5) if indeed there were maimed animals found in the park and no one saw the perpetrator, perhaps he did it in the evening.
@Sor Juana, if you are interested in the perp profile, I wonder if he has nocturnal circadian rhythm. That would allow him to stay undetected, especially if he now works at night. He could be a garbage man, a stacker, have a shift work in a port or at any assembly line. He has to avoid being fingerprinted but for some jobs, it is easy, He can work at a graveyard. I don’t know if he ever graduated, perhaps not, but staying with parents and working at night is a perfect way to be under any radar. People know him, maybe know he’s odd, but he leaves for work every night, so no one thinks of him twice. There are nocturnal cities (Barcelona), but Tokyo, probably, is merely “evening enough”? That’s actually an easy way. He can become a pest exterminator, too.