I didn't say it was a robbery. I think that since the criminal entered the house and left it in such a way that no one can understand how he did it, did not leave any traces or clues (exclusively in the method of entry and nothing more). So he is a pro at this.
GreK, he is not a pro at this. The literal Tokyo MPD noted his sloppiness, the "treasure trove" of evidence he left behind. That he was not apprehended is not evidence of professionalism; that is a false cause argument. And by leaning on it, the suggestion is, any criminal who is not apprehended is therefore a "pro". Half of murders in the US go unsolved each year, it does not mean that half were perpetrated by professionals. Perhaps the TMPD are wrong, perhaps this whole thread is wrong, perhaps you are the lone, shining beacon of veracity here. Even so, you would still require links when you state something as a fact versus an opinion on WS.
Namely in the art of entering without a trace.
He left traces. The problem is he left too many traces. That has muddled his entry point. Had Haruko been able to clearly recall the status of the front door when she entered, things would be different. Put another way; he was relying on an old lady to not remember the status of a door or window. That is simply absurd for a so-called pro. Moreover, for all we know, the TMPD
are aware of his entry and exit point but they're keeping it back. This is something police often do and, in the case of LE in Japan, I have seen it many times.
The criminal who committed this has not been found to this day. Does this mean anything? It does.
Respectfully, you don't know that. It means nothing more than
he has not yet been found. If you are going to state as fact that him being free to this day means he is a pro, please share how you are so certain of this. If it is merely your opinion, please frame it as such. As per the words of the mod, who I believe snipped your post yesterday: "WS requires links to anything stated as fact. Do NOT introduce something that can not be supported and linked to either MSM or LE. "
An unthinkable amount of evidence, traces - and what, in the end, did they help much? So he knows how to hide, not get caught on camera, not get caught by the police, etc. So he is not simple, not a random person.
What if he merely had a way out of the country? You are re-hashing a debate from 2.5 years ago on which there are literally hundreds of posts. You DO NOT know whether he was a "simple" or "random" person, whatever that may mean. Nor do you know if he is some sort of pro assassin. It would be a much better idea to say that you
believe him to be such. Though you would still be wrong, in my estimation.
Otherwise, it turns out that how he got in is unclear, how he hid is unclear, he wasn’t caught on camera, etc. He can’t be so lucky in all of this, one or two times, yes, maybe he was lucky, it happens, but in total, how many lucky breaks are there?
Just because you cannot explain it, just because it seems improbable to you, it does not mean you can draw any solid conclusions. It's like saying that because I don't know how a clock is built, therefore God must exist. Yes, clearly the killer got lucky and more than once. But what if he simply had a car outside the house? What if he left Japan the next day? And if the implication is that he's a professional, then why does he bring a sushi knife which is entirely inappropriate for the application of violence? It breaks the first time he uses it. Why does he let a small salary man almost get the better of him? Why does he remain behind in the house? Why does he eat their melon? Perks of the assassin profession? As you say, once he's made the mistake, all bets are off and he leaves his evidence everywhere. Today, he's Japan most wanted fugitive. So, all in all, not much of a pro.
With all that said, this will be my last correspondence with you. Welcome to the thread, I hope you find it interesting.
