Some unanswered questions to ponder -
If MF left the 1. Ale House at closing, where was she from 2:30 until 3:37AM when she's seen on the Sheetz video in Fuquay? She called Colleen at 2:27AM and she said she called her on her way home. It's probably a 15 minute drive. Why did it take her 70 minutes to get to Sheetz?
MF definitely stated that Mr. G (dog) was in the house and she stated in early interviews that she saw 2. bloody paw prints in the house - police never found any. The dog had no blood on him. How does one explain this?
3.How did C. get from the body/blood to the bathroom? There was no trail of bloody footprints. So she was lifted and placed in the bathroom but all of the prints are in one direction, all are dark and some are just the toes - as if she was transferred several times to make the prints. How can this be possible? If she had truly stepped in blood and walked to the bathroom, her feet would have mostly dried by the time she reached the bathroom floor.
The child wasn't able to dress herself at that age, yet she was found with no diaper, dry and wearing pants. 4.She would typically wake up and remove her pants and diaper so the pants probably would have been inside out when removed. How did she fix them and put them on when this is not something she was able to do?
Her hands were in the blood based on the smears on the wall, yet no blood on her hands. The bathroom looks so staged to me. I can't believe more people can't see that.
5.Two sets of footprints/two people in an SUV at 5:30ish.
Then you look at JY and "He "could have" done it" isn't good enough. I would believe it if his mileage/gas receipts didn't add up but they did. Also, as someone mentioned - if the HI is the alibi, 6. why doesn't he intentionally show himself on a lobby camera in the morning getting coffee? He is aware of cameras if he unplugged one of them so that is a real inconsistency/hole in the state's case to me.
Way too many problems with their case.