It is interesting that one of the girls (I think the eldest) has a middle name too.
i wonder if there will be a last name change to probyn someday. just wondering.
Why Probyn?
The thing is is that by the time they are college age, they can legally change their last name as well (if Dugard was too recognizable) to anything they want. I have two good friends who changed their names as adults. One went from Agnes (beautiful woman with an ugly name) to Angie, the other from plain old Susan to Suzanne (much more exotic).If I had to guess, I bet Starlit's the one who changed her name. Perhaps they both have middle names? The one who didn't change her name could always go by her middle name in public to remain more anonymous, though it's possible that people will have forgotten a lot about this case by the time they enter college and the workforce.
Why Probyn?
Found it: She worked full-time for Contra Costa ARC from December 1994 until March 1998, arriving with stellar references as a nursing aide and physical therapy aide, said Barbara Maizie, the agency's executive director.
<snip> She arrived with a valid California Nurse Aide license, a history of nursing home work and a long resume with both in-state and out-of-state references dating to 1981, Maizie said. http://www.allbusiness.com/crime-la...ions/criminal-offenses-crimes/12838181-1.html
The prosecution will use the records to establish a timeline of sex abuse, but some legal experts think Garrido's lawyers might try to challenge the validity of the birth certificate.
http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/loca...-Finally-Get-Birth-Certificates-82787552.html
The prosecution will use the records to establish a timeline of sex abuse, but some legal experts think Garrido's lawyers might try to challenge the validity of the birth certificate.
http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/loca...-Finally-Get-Birth-Certificates-82787552.html
Well, that would be the logical thing for them to do since the dates have some impact on the specific charges.
They will bother. It is the responsibility of the defence to attack the credibility of evidence presented by the state when it is open to question.
They will bother. It is the responsibility of the defence to attack the credibility of evidence presented by the state when it is open to question.
I think the timeline they will dispute is when Jaycee conceived. She had the first girl when she was 14 yes, but she conceived when she was 13. The rules for children under 14 and over 14 are different. I think they will try to prove Jaycee a total lier and that he did not have sex with her until she was over 14 and that the first girl was perhaps born in February of 95. As far as insanity, both being insane for 18 years is pushing it a bit. They (the prosecution) is probably hoping that Jaycee will either not testify like she said she would or that she will try to defend the G's by saying he didn't touch her at first. This is just all supposition.
And just a thought, different subject but same. It is a good thing jaycee and her girls were found. The G's gave them no avenues to support themselves. When granny died, her social security would also go. So where would they get money. The printing business was substandard (don't get angry but it was). I think Mr. G would have resorted to pimping out both Jaycee and her girls for money. The religious thing was just a means to get money and it was failing. The black box was an attempt to get money and no sane person would ever believe or invest in that. Taxes were due on the home. Time was definitely running out.