According to the NYT, the sister recommended RC for the job at Yale, and apparently he lied on is application, so maybe they could use that as leverage to get rid of her. I would imagine it would be a pretty hostile work environment for all three to return to.Random questions
1) I wonder if RC's fiancee, brother-in-law or sister will ever report back to work? I doubt it, but I'm curious if they could if they wanted to... after all, jobs are scare, and finding jobs isn't easy in this economy.
2) I wonder if there is any legal leverage the University can use to prevent the trio from returning to work? After all, I can imagine it would NOT be a pleasant working environment for others... and for them. Any one have any workplace legal, union, or HR knowledge on this?
3) is the brother-in-law RC's sister's husband?
The jobs are competitive, and many get through the door with the help of a friend or relative. Mr. Clarks brother-in-law and sister also work as animal technicians, and she recommended Mr. Clark for a position in the washing center in 2004, the year he graduated from high school in nearby Branford.
The university asks that technicians have familiarity with animals. Mr. Clark confided in one co-worker that he had listed on his résumé that he had worked on a farm, even though he had not, the co-worker said. The co-worker spoke on the condition of anonymity because Yale officials had instructed employees not to speak with the news media.
Yales Web site says it conducts criminal background checks of its employees, and since 2007, it has required all educational and employment credentials be verified.