Love Never Fails
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2013
- Messages
- 13,035
- Reaction score
- 83,751
Can JM still being in witnesses during this penalty phase? If so, has a list of those witnesses been published? Thank you so much.
Can JM still being in witnesses during this penalty phase? If so, has a list of those witnesses been published? Thank you so much.
Is it possible that Patricia Womack and/or Darryl Brewer were allowed to plead Jodi's case yesterday when the proceedings were closed to the public?
What if Jodi just flat-out did not want to participate in any way in the mitigation process after hearing the Alexanders' victim impact statements, insisting that she wants only the death penalty...was that an option for her?
AZ Lawyer: I just want to thank you so much for your time and patience in answering questions. Your answers are always concise and easy to understand. If you don't already teach law, you should consider it!
One last general question before all heck breaks loose next week: Since both JM and JW work for the State, do they work out of the same building or, Heaven forbid, share the same office space? I'm assuming the personnel, computer systems and filing space for the district attorneys and public defenders are completely separate?
my question is about the behaviors of the defense attornys- can they be disciplined for presenting a case that had no facts other than what the defendant told them I understand they have to do what they can to defend her but attacking the victim in they way they did - can they be held accountable in any way- can the victims family go after them for slander can j wilmot be disciplined for her disrespect she exhibited to the court judge jury and prosecutor and co counsel - she was writing the entire time the prosecutor did his closing argument even during the brother' impact statement-isn't there a certain decorum that should be exhibited in court
I have read about as much of the trial as I can (working mom with little time here!). I do not think that I heard this, but I am wondering why it wasn't presented. (I apologize in advance if it was used by the prosecution and I missed it!)
I know that Jodi was already convicted of being cruel, but I really thought that they might bring up one additional factor in the cruelty phase. Can't they drive home the fact that Jodi didn't have wounds? Not specifically that Travis didn't "abuse" her when she so maliciously slaughter him. But, he was a BIG, strong guy. He lived for a short time after she started the attack. She didn't have wounds from him defending himself! He was fighting for his life, and she didn't have any wounds. It seems like he could have at least punched her in the face, and he didn't.
AZ lawyer:
all about Donavan Bering: http://www.courtminutes.maricopa.gov/docs/Criminal/012009/m3543122.pdf
http://www.courtminutes.maricopa.go...todate=&submit=Retrieve+Minute+Entries#search
IF none of the above holds: have to go here:
http://www.courtminutes.maricopa.gov/
Enter: Bering
Enter: Donavan
Herein lie the problem about DB being a convicted felon, probation officer, etc.
Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - SIDEBAR #3- Arias/Alexander forum
help please. I think this is getting out of hand. raying:
TIA.
So what's the problem exactly?
So what's the problem exactly?
If I may, I believe there is the question of the legality of someone who is on probation/parole consorting with another prisoner OR attending the trial. And now that Jodi has been convicted Donovan is still in contact with her which is a no-no?
WHAT parole? SEE above. NO parole for DB ... ever!!!!!!! Nevermind.:truce: I flat give up.
If I may, I believe there is the question of the legality of someone who is on probation/parole consorting with another prisoner OR attending the trial. And now that Jodi has been convicted Donovan is still in contact with her which is a no-no?
Well, I thought I said what the problem was? :findinglink: See above. I may just need to go to bed and regroup, maybe, by Monday. :whiteflag:
Not a fan of FB "facts" which I posted along with DB court ME.
Oh well. :bedtime:
Thank you AZ Lawyer. I really appreciate what you do for us.
I had a couple of questions about the mitigation testimony of Patricia Womack and Darryl Brewer. Do they have to speak? Can they refuse, or are they forced to do it like a subpoena?
Also, I've read that they are going to testify and therefore can be cross-examined by the prosecution, but there is the option for them to just speak at a podium and not be cross-examined, provided they don't say anything that would be considered evidence. Is this true? If so, whose decision is it whether to testify or just speak? And why would someone choose one over the other? I'm a little confused because I guess I would have thought it would be better for Jodi (and possibly for Womack and Brewer) for them to just go up and say that they consider her a good friend and worth sparing as opposed to testifying and opening themselves up for cross-examination.
Thanks.
question if defense doesn't put on anything and rests can juan still put on his side or is it over than and they go to closings again thankyou
Is CFJA allowed a TV in her cell? Please say "no", I've had enough stress from this case!!
TIA