paperwing
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2009
- Messages
- 1,563
- Reaction score
- 0
do you happen to remember the robert durst case in galveston? crazy guy. he's killed several people. but that trial was about him killing his neighbor in a boarding house. he shot the guy, cut up his body and tossed bags into galveston bay.
his attorney, dick deguerin, convinced the jury it was self defense based on nothing besides durst's word. if i remember right, they never recovered his head, and durst said he shot him in the head. deguerin also convinced the jury that they should not consider ANYTHING he did after the actual killing as meaning he was guilty of murder. they bought it. they acquitted him of murder.
Is that the one where Durst was from the Ukraine or something and mentally challenged? And the dead guy's wife was charged with the murder? Maybe I'm thinking of the wrong case.
The main point is - your answer isn't what I was hoping to hear.
Thank you, though! There is so much cover-up evidence... I wish there was just one iron-clad item of proof/evidence of premeditation that cannot be disputed or explained alternatively.
Then again, I have absolute faith in JM - he's been superb from day one and I'm sure there will be a conviction. I just have a little nagging feeling in a very small space in my brain that keeps poking me on this. I generally have no problem laughing at it, but since it's there I figured I'd ask the best group I know for such a question!
Thanks again.