tinkabella
New Member
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2013
- Messages
- 890
- Reaction score
- 0
The judge should not allow this. The tape is one sided and the jury has already heard both sides on tape. There is no reason to admit this into evidence.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am so sick of this....we have heard it all before and no matter how they cut it, we all know she is loving every minute of it. This Judge needs to get a spine and stand up to some of this!
This is why they cancelled court that day that she was crying. IMO, they wanted this, their arrangement of clips and words, of that tape played and NOTHING else. Judge wouldn't allow it. MOO.
Why is KA shaking her head and acting all solemn? HUH???????????????????????????????????????
I kind of feel sorry for Nurmi. He didn't want this case. He couldn't get out of it. It is a big headache for him, I'm sure.
He is doing the best he can with a client like JA. He can't just throw her under the bus. Let's give him a break.
This is NEW territory, right????
WTH!
I didn't hear that rape comment when the tape was first played!
That's gotta be a different tape.
I still cannot get over how she thinks her soft, cooperative demeanor today vs. her snarky, nasty, combative demeanor with Juan is going to help her. If I was a juror I would be completely p*ssed off, since I would want to get to the truth. Her behaviour is only emphasizing to the jury that she sure was determined to evade the truth with Juan by playing her word games and challenges to the questions. The truth is always the truth. No word games necessary.