Jodi Arias TAKES THE STAND FOR 7TH DAY #42 *may contain graphic and adult content*

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Wish I could be there today to support you and the family.

It's going to be a tough day for them, they're in my thoughts.

I'm headed out in just a few min ..to my day job then quickly to the courthouse. I won't have easy internet access until I get home tonite so please if you want me to look for something in specific anyone post it here quickly and i"ll do my best. I'll be there w/ my journal and my blue Travis ribbon and my best attempt at a stone face.

See you all later...........:seeya:
 
someone asked earlier about arias mailing a pamphlet.. her lies about that start around 20:00 here:

Jodi Arias Trial - Day 19 - Part 2 - YouTube

(also lies about the phone sex call as well)

Hey Arias: you don't want him to spend the night with friends who have children but you want the both of you to be great friends and allow your respective children to play together?

:no:

She is PURE EVIL!!! :furious:
 
sorry texmex ! this trial has made me soooooo irritable....:blushing:

No worries bexlex. I kind of think if she did drive there intending to kill him (which I do believe) then it seems she would have wanted to make sure he would be home. But who knows? :banghead:
 
Good morning my imaginary friends!! Lasagna is baking slowly in the oven, salad is in the crisper and I am cheating on the garlic bread. Going to use Texas toast! All are invited to my house to watch the trial! :great:

That would be worth blowing my diet for!
 
i totally believe they had sex and lots of it. it was the way she hung onto him. i think she was his teacher---he was new to the subject----and like any healthy young man, he liked it. he wasn't going to get it with the other girls he knew and he couldn't quite let her go, even though he knew she was trouble.

I guess I think they had lots of verbal sex maybe and she blackmailed him with things like the recording and him being a late bloomer on the sex scene he was like a 15 yr old with *advertiser censored*. I agree she was his teacher and I think the teacher was pissed when the objection of her obsession could not be lured into making the stories real. JMHO...........at this point, anyway! LOL

Did they find any 'toys' condoms or anything that jodi couldn't have planted that night? How on earth could he been
having wild trysts with her as much as she says and his roommates never have a clue?

I just think is rejection was straw that blew her obsession into the fatal events of that night.
 
One last thing: I know jurors aren't supposed to be doing "research" on their own but I honestly hope at least one of them went home and looked up the term "sociopath" after yesterday. I'm certain at least one of them knows just what that means...and now they get to look at her through that lens. Thank you Travis. :(
 
ME TOO! I think it was her idea to "buy" his car in order to stay in some kind of "relationship" with him in every way she could.

Then I think she destroyed that car on purpose. She had no attachment to him...only to HIM through the car.

And her intent has been from some time to destroy every single possible thing about this man's life and very being.

I have never despised or felt so ...what's even the word....Britskate describes my feelings best...about any murderer, including my sisters' than I do toward this evil evil personification of EVIL.

I agree. She may have been hoping he would tell her she could stay because the car was ruined and blame the Uhaul guy for the damages. Didn't work out that way. Either way, she was still tied to him financially. She either owed him for the car or the damages. jmo
 
Going out on a limb here - but I don't think that JA and TA ever had real physical sex. (salad hopper or va-jj as Oprah calls it!) I think at MOST - they had verbal sex. I think JA led the conversation on the tape we heard and her game was to make the stories reality, not just verbal erotic games. I think at most, TA tried to give jodi what she wanted - a tale of submission as a slave by her master. His job was to make up more and more "DEBASING" tales to feed her fantasy. Since jodi spoke of the stories as reality, so did TA.
However, what bothers me is there is no proof that they were actually ever intimate. The photos all looked staged and covertly taken (some with timer maybe)......... If you notice the one with the big KY jelly bottle - the bottle gets moved on the bed. First shot, to me TA appears to be asleep. Second shot he appears to have awoken by something - was it when she moved the KY bottle?
Could she have been in the closet across from the shower taking the pics without his knowledge? Could he have noticed movement and come out of the shower, her having the knife already and the camera in hand and upon striking him with both hands engaged the photos we see during the murder?

I discount all texts and emails - since JA admits having "stumbled" or hacked into his accounts and conveniently many messages are missing or deleted. Then she claims she used her Olympus camera to record the sex when she couldn't figure out the timer - but alas, that got deleted too. So where is the proof that this was anything more than verbal sex fantasy games? A game, that IMHO TA doesn't sound 'excited' about as much as he sounds accommodating of for the desire of JA to be a slave controlled by her 'debasing' master.

I also think if they were having real va-jj sex, she would have made sure to get preggers -- that was the trap she couldn't pull off and if TA would not go past verbal stories then she couldn't use that trick.

So - can anyone point to anything that jodi couldn't have faked (like email, texts etc) or staged or kept the context of the talks as real events to strongly indicate to me there was actual physical sex? I have only seen about 3 or 4 shots of jodi that night and all are solo - shots that could have easily been done with a timer on a camera. If I were on that jury, I would be tossing out all these sex escapades as tainted due to lack of proof.

Okay, so laugh at me, but is anyone else having a hard time believing that physical sex ever occurred?

I'm not having problems...I have moe problems with her saying they were a couple...how she kept appearing in his life....but yeah I think something happened --- not that much but things happened
 
Will she cry today as she recounts the murder, or stay calm?
We WILL get to the murder today, right??
 
Going out on a limb here - but I don't think that JA and TA ever had real physical sex. (salad hopper or va-jj as Oprah calls it!) I think at MOST - they had verbal sex. I think JA led the conversation on the tape we heard and her game was to make the stories reality, not just verbal erotic games. I think at most, TA tried to give jodi what she wanted - a tale of submission as a slave by her master. His job was to make up more and more "DEBASING" tales to feed her fantasy. Since jodi spoke of the stories as reality, so did TA.
However, what bothers me is there is no proof that they were actually ever intimate. The photos all looked staged and covertly taken (some with timer maybe)......... If you notice the one with the big KY jelly bottle - the bottle gets moved on the bed. First shot, to me TA appears to be asleep. Second shot he appears to have awoken by something - was it when she moved the KY bottle?
Could she have been in the closet across from the shower taking the pics without his knowledge? Could he have noticed movement and come out of the shower, her having the knife already and the camera in hand and upon striking him with both hands engaged the photos we see during the murder?

I discount all texts and emails - since JA admits having "stumbled" or hacked into his accounts and conveniently many messages are missing or deleted. Then she claims she used her Olympus camera to record the sex when she couldn't figure out the timer - but alas, that got deleted too. So where is the proof that this was anything more than verbal sex fantasy games? A game, that IMHO TA doesn't sound 'excited' about as much as he sounds accommodating of for the desire of JA to be a slave controlled by her 'debasing' master.

I also think if they were having real va-jj sex, she would have made sure to get preggers -- that was the trap she couldn't pull off and if TA would not go past verbal stories then she couldn't use that trick.

So - can anyone point to anything that jodi couldn't have faked (like email, texts etc) or staged or kept the context of the talks as real events to strongly indicate to me there was actual physical sex? I have only seen about 3 or 4 shots of jodi that night and all are solo - shots that could have easily been done with a timer on a camera. If I were on that jury, I would be tossing out all these sex escapades as tainted due to lack of proof.

Okay, so laugh at me, but is anyone else having a hard time believing that physical sex ever occurred?

Since what two people do in the bedroom unobserved can never be known with certainty we can speculate until the cows come home. JA is an inveterate liar and TA is dead.

They may have merely simulated sex ; then again maybe not. They may have engaged in even more kinky sex play or maybe not.

We will never know.

BUT my bet is that TA was a horny 30 year old male that was introduced to “kinky sex” by JA. Based on the audio tapes TA freely spoke about pornographic grade sex play with JA. It would seem that TA had seen his share of *advertiser censored*. Though it is noteworthy that no *advertiser censored* sites were accessed on his “borrowed laptop” computer. In any case based on TA” s conversation with JA it is likely that they engaged in genuine authentic oral anal and even vaginal sex. Also based on the trial pictures of the nude JA one readily notes the gapping size of her vagina and anus. Something or somebody with a pretty large instrument penetrated these orifices.

My hunch is JA was on birth control pills so she needn’t have relied on TA or other male penetrators to use condoms.
 
Good morning my imaginary friends!! Lasagna is baking slowly in the oven, salad is in the crisper and I am cheating on the garlic bread. Going to use Texas toast! All are invited to my house to watch the trial! :great:
You're so kind, thank you! Sounds yummy.
 
Was there any testimony about JA's camera? Did the police find it in Yreka? And was anything on it to validate yesterday's testimony about her using it on June 4th? TIA
 
Good morning katfish

It's possible but for reference most 25 caliber handguns are very small. They are of course deadly and dangerous but IMO a man Travis's size would rush a 110 pound woman holding a very small gun and try to disarm her, not pose for pictures
View attachment 29971

On one of the TH shows last night, a good friend of TA's was interviewed. He said they went shooting often & TA very much enjoyed it. He said a .25 was "good for nothing," in so many words, and said he was sure TA would consult him before buying a handgun. And this guy (sorry, can't remember the program or his name -- duh) said he would recommend a handgun much more powerful -- a .45 or .38 or whatever. He seemed knowledgeable & sincere.

ETA: He also said that, to his knowledge, TA did not own a gun, and he added that he was sure TA would consult him before he did and that TA would let him know as soon as he had gotten one.
 
I'm headed out in just a few min ..to my day job then quickly to the courthouse. I won't have easy internet access until I get home tonite so please if you want me to look for something in specific anyone post it here quickly and i"ll do my best. I'll be there w/ my journal and my blue Travis ribbon and my best attempt at a stone face.

See you all later...........:seeya:

I'd like to know what the jurors do when there is a side bar and how they react when juan objects. Expressions and are they more attentive.

Thank you :)
 
One last thing: I know jurors aren't supposed to be doing "research" on their own but I honestly hope at least one of them went home and looked up the term "sociopath" after yesterday. I'm certain at least one of them knows just what that means...and now they get to look at her through that lens. Thank you Travis. :(

Because defense let her read that in court do you suppose RM can bring in an expert that would describe the traits of a sociopath???
 
Somehow I had missed this unterview-thanks for posting it. What a liar-I don't see any truth in anything she says. Come "judgement day", as she says, she will be sent straight to hell.

Makes it pretty obvious that her whole demeanor in court is a complete act.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
74
Guests online
210
Total visitors
284

Forum statistics

Threads
608,353
Messages
18,238,124
Members
234,350
Latest member
pto002studyguide
Back
Top