More from Randolph Beasley crime scene expert on Dr. Drew.
Look at page 4 of autopsy report--the pathologist clearly states that there was no major damage to the brain because of the wound path. Read what it says. It says the wound path of the bullet did not do major damage to the brain. That's what it says. And, so, he doesn't even list the bullet as one of the causes of death. It's a shock force injury. The stabbing did the cause of death, not the bullet. Look at the details on that report.
The bullet ended up near the jaw. The reason you take a gun to kill someone in a premeditated game of attack is because that's what you're going to use. So when the gun jammed--she even used that scenario in a story with the two ninja intruders. Why? Because a suspect will typically take part of the truth and then they'll fabricate this story, which is what she did. The scenario of the gunshot first makes more sense in a crime scene reconstruction.
The report says there is no "GROSS evidence" and explains that due to the state of decomp, examination was limited. It also describes the physical evidence of the path of the bullet, from which we can determine that it had to have hit the brain. If this is not clear from his report, he clearly wxplained it on the stand.
No one said the gunshot came last and therefore caused his death. This is a straw man. The fact that there was little to no bleeding from the bullet, and the stabbing/slashing killed him, only helps prove the gunshot wasn't first. :/
How does it make more sense? Please explain.