Jodi Arias trial discussion #21 *may contain graphic and adult content*

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
My theory is because she was not convicted, and they think they can keep making money off her.

In my view, these defense attorneys pale in comparison to all the lying and cheating done by CA attorneys. I do think that photo flashing was an intentional deceitful way of showing the jury those 'cause they knew they would not get them into evidence. But at least they are not lying to the judge and calling people names.

I think JW flashing the photos was a fu to Juan and to let him know that she didn't mind getting her hand slap. kinda childish isn't it?

They both know that's it's out there and it could or couldn't be Travis, but no one can swear to it. We can hope that is another thing thing they jury will hold against the DT. A waste of time and taxpayer's money.
 
Hey Jodi,

sticker,375x360.png


:floorlaugh: :floorlaugh: :floorlaugh:
 
Travis Victor Alexander
July 28, 1977 - June 4, 2008
http://i46.tinypic.com/96kyhj.png

Summary of case and key dates:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/1...n_2387245.html
Crime Scene Photographs:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...n_2412031.html
Detective's Investigative Report:
http://grahamwinch.files.wordpress.c...tionreport.pdf
Autopsy Report:
http://cnninsession.files.wordpress....visautopsy.pdf



BLOGS AND MYSPACE
Travis' blog: http://travisalexander.blogspot.com/
Travis' myspace: http://www.myspace.com/tvalexander
Defendants' blog: http://jodiarias.blogspot.com/
Defendants' myspace: http://www.myspace.com/jodiarias
Defendants' other myspace: http://www.myspace.com/jfineart

WS MEMBER RMT's TIMELINE
https://sites.google.com/site/jodiariastrial/
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0Ak0vUAK8UbSndFl4X1V3YkZXazU0X25pQndhNVVmbXc&gid=0

MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Jodi Ann Arias DOB 7/1980
Public Access to Criminal Court Case Information
Case History, Case# CR2008-031021
Criminal Court Case History
Minute Entries, Case# CR2008031021
Clerk of the Superior Court Minute Entries

MEDIA COVERAGE
ABC15 Jodi Arias Murder Trial
ABCNews Jodi Arias
CBSNews Crimesider
CNN (HLN) show transcripts
FOX10News Jodi Arias Trial
HLNtv Jodi Arias
Huff Post Jodi Arias
KPHO Jodi Arias

FACEBOOK
Beth Karas InSession
David Lohr
In Session
In Memory of Travis Alexander
JaneVelezMitchellHLN
Justice4Travis
NancyGraceHLN

TWITTER
#TravisAlexander
#JodiArias
#Arias
@ABC
@BethKaras
@chriswnews
@courtpio
@David_Lohr
@InSession
@jvelezmitchell
@maryellenabc15
@michaelbkiefer
@NancyGraceHLN
@shannahogan
@VinniePolitan

TRIAL LIVE STREAMING
Trial starts at 10:30am MST (GMT -7:00) (12:30pm EST)
http://www.abc15.com/generic/news/region_phoenix_metro/central_phoenix/Jodi-Arias-trial-Live-video-
http://www.azfamily.com/home/Watch-LIVE-Jodi-Arias-murder-trial-185415702.html
http://www.azcentral.com/live/?event=011613-jodi-arias-trial
http://www.kpho.com/category/224303/cbs-5-local-live-streaming
http://radaronline.com/exclusives/2013/01/jodi-arias-trial-livestream/
:bump:

Seal time :wink:
 
There is a OB/GYN Dr at the hospital where I work by the name of Dr B*tcher
 
I see trail coverage on both HLN and TruTV channels. I get both only through the computer - which one is everyone watching? Thanks for help!

your able to get tru tv on your computer?????? I thought they took it down?:seeya:
 
My very first OBGYN's name was Doctor Forks...... no lie! I was terrified!!!!!!
 
My suspicion is that they were the penis pictures and Dworkin is hesitant to point out that they came from Jodi's computer/drive - not Travis's as they were trying to imply via "oops" last week.

No they weren't those pics because those pics were not entered into evidence as per the Judge's first order of bidness today...
 
the only real inroads:

they showed pictures from her camera that show her with darker hair in May (but it is not dark brown by any means) and then another picture from May that shows her with even a different hair color

I think it was pointless because it showed how often she changed her hair color.

We still have the witness from the car place that ID'd her but said her hair was "blonde"

I'm a little frustrated that police didn't research her receipts just prior to the murder and find someplace that had her on video to prove she had blonde hair instead of leaving it up to witness discretion. Surely she went to a drugstore or Walmart or grocery or gas station days PRIOR to her Arizona trip. Surely there is surveillance video. It's very tedious to find, but beats trying to argue what one person calls "blonde" and another person calls light brown". JMO

WAIT!!! Didn't she see Daryl Brewer days before her trip? What color hair did he say she had then???
 
With all due respect Lamb Chop and I am an art dealer here myself *I would not personally sell any of her work or any work invovled with a crime, especially at the time of the trial*

If you look at the listing it says Travis Alexander by Jodi Arias in the title, nowhere else does it claim to be a 100% authentic JA painting. Titles in paintings are not an accurate statement of fact, they are whatever the artist chooses to call them.

The title is misleading, yes. But technically it is not fraud. In the listings at the bottom it does not claim to be by her.

Look, I don't agree with this painting, I think it is in incredibly poor taste, but I can't claim to know the motivation behind the person listing when I don't know them, I suggested a possible reason. Moo suggested another, which was a really good point.

But I don't think it is fraud, I really don't. Misleading probably deliberately.

As far as the cost goes, yes I think they have set it to current interest standards, but IMO I am sometimes amazed at the unrealistic expectations people have in regard to the asking prices of their work!

Very good point, Tricksy. Whoever created it, certainly in bad and cruel taste, could simply be saying, "This is what Jodi Arias did to Travis Alexander," thus the "catchy" title.

I can't see where it is signed (maybe it's there and I just can't discern it), but the one who created this piece of carp should have had the ballz to sign it.

I would like to know the conditions/reasons by which it was removed...

In any event, I'm glad it's gone and I hope it wasn't sold. Grrrrrrrr.
 
It wasn't on the computer!

It's like asking a librarian to look up a book for you and then getting mad they didn't read it for you as well. It's not his job to investigate outside of the scope of forensically analyzing computers and like devices.

EXACTLY!
IMO: As a technical expert, it is only his (Dworkin's) job to provide objective data.
It is not his job to investigate the meaningful content of that data, nor to taint it with his own subjective speculations or opinions.:twocents:

(Which is a GOOD thing (IMO)...because otherwise, any old tom, dick or harriet could say just about anything he/she wanted to on the stand and it would be an exercise in futility to pinpoint accurate information to arrive at truth):twocents:

I do believe it is TRUE that JM is a masterful prosecuting attorney in his posturing and in being able to pose the particular kind of questions he chooses to ask, especially when also demanding an absolute answer from any given witness when the true answer in all actuality may be a relative one that resides someplace in the middle of a graded continuum; however I do NOT believe that this expert was inept, argumentative or stupid AT ALL. :twocents:

IMO, if I am a witness and I have testified that the temperature outside is 25 degrees, Juan's question to me might be: "Ms Fowler, is that hot or cold?"

In my mind, before being able to answer that question accurately and truthfully, I would really NEED to know if the scale was Fahrenheit or Celsius, first. That temperature in Celsius would be around comfortable indoor room temperature whereas in Fahrenheit it would be brrrrr....COLD.

Would Juan ALLOW me to ASK whether the scale was C or F? I think he would shout: "I ask the questions here, Ms. Fowler!!!! Hot or cold?!!!"

I'd be cryin' me a RIVER up there on that stand....:please::please:

Used-Car-Salesman "types" have always tended to really, really, REALLY rub me the wrong way, but I gotta tell you, when ol' GS was up on that stand I felt so SORRY for him!:twocents:

Juan is highly skilled in seizing everything available to him to portray a given situation in exactly the light he wants an audience to view that particular situation. Masterful, he is. JMO:twocents:
 
I'm a little frustrated that police didn't research her receipts just prior to the murder and find someplace that had her on video to prove she had vblonde hair instead of leaving it up to witness discretion. Surely she went to a drugstore or Walmart or grocery or gas station PRIOR to her Arizona trip. Surely there is surveillance video. It's very tedious to find, but beats trying to argue what one person calls "blonde" and another person calls light brown". JMO

Aren't those videos in black and white mostly?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
97
Guests online
175
Total visitors
272

Forum statistics

Threads
608,832
Messages
18,246,225
Members
234,462
Latest member
Kajal
Back
Top