Agatha_C
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2010
- Messages
- 2,309
- Reaction score
- 23
Ramseys....hahaha
Ya nuffy.
LOL! Whew! I have been called many things in my life but a nuffy is new...LOL!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ramseys....hahaha
Ya nuffy.
JAR might have been in the video, maybe that's why it was "missing". Also, it is odd that JR hired lawyers for JAR's MOTHER. Why would she need a lawyer? She was not a suspect. The only reason she'd need a lawyer is to be protected from answering questions about JAR's whereabouts Christmas day, and any photographic evidence refuting that claim.
There are SO many different R's who could have been involved in this- Patsy, JR, JAR, BR, even DP. That's why I can never narrow it down to the point where I am SURE who did this.
As far as there being uncertainty as to whether the scarf was JR's or another party guest- all they had to do was find the one that was JR's. If there WAS no other scarf- that one was JR's. Same stuff they tried to pull with the flashlight.
They had one that LOOKED like that one. They kept it in a drawer off the kitchen. That drawer was empty. NO flashlight in the drawer. Well, guess what? Then the one that LOOKS like yours IS yours, unless you can provide the one you claim is yours.
DeeDee, I have taken some time to ponder this post and I will have to respectfully disagree with one of the points you made (In bold above). I dont think thats the only reason she would need a lawyer. Its very possible that JR didnt want some of his secrets getting out. What if he had molested one of their own children, such as the daughter he seemed to have loved more than any of his other children. A lawyer and a nice keep your mouth shut check, may well have been more to JRs benefit. Who knows what the exwife could have said about her exhusband that cheated on her, like maybe he cheated with young women, why not, he married one (not that all men married to younger woman are molesters, but it has been a sign for some). Maybe he had shown a tendency for violence in that marriage.
I just cant honestly except that JAR would be the only reason for a lawyer. I think family secrets would be another good reason.
The flashlight I agree with, if it looks just like yours and was found in your house, then its yours.
While I agree with all the questions surrounding JR lawyering up his ex and children, I cannot understand why he didn't do the same for Patsy's family.
DeeDee, I have taken some time to ponder this post and I will have to respectfully disagree with one of the points you made (In bold above). I dont think thats the only reason she would need a lawyer. Its very possible that JR didnt want some of his secrets getting out. What if he had molested one of their own children, such as the daughter he seemed to have loved more than any of his other children. A lawyer and a nice keep your mouth shut check, may well have been more to JRs benefit. Who knows what the exwife could have said about her exhusband that cheated on her, like maybe he cheated with young women, why not, he married one (not that all men married to younger woman are molesters, but it has been a sign for some). Maybe he had shown a tendency for violence in that marriage.
I just cant honestly except that JAR would be the only reason for a lawyer. I think family secrets would be another good reason.
The flashlight I agree with, if it looks just like yours and was found in your house, then its yours.
it's because he wanted to prevent HIS family from talking.must have been his folks that knew something?not about the murder but about him?
I believe this also goes along with deflection AWAY from John. He set the stage very well. Telling LE that it seemed like the RN was written by a woman, that he found JonBenet at 11, that he saw her through a door/wall that was in his way, that he moved JAR's suitcase, that he wouldn't talk until the BPD officially and publicly cleared his older children.
Constant deflection. Constant attention to details that could be disproven OR were lies. Patsy mor followed along. She got angry when questioned, because I believe it was anger toward the lies she was telling. I believe this increased, when she realized she was being made the scapegoat. That EVERYONE suspected HER guilt, but thought 'poor John'. IMOO, and from observations and transcripts.
The only thing keeping me from thinking JAR was involved, is the roll of film taken from the Rs camera, by LE. In the photo interview, both JR and PR were shown pictures that LE had developed from the film taken from JR camera. Film from Christmas.
Patsy Ramsey: "...This (scarf) just looks strange to me...."?
This is on topic, so please bare with me..
In the movie "Sleepers" (based on true facts) two men, that as boys had gone to a corectional facility and were molested by some of the guards. Years later the boys now men run into one of the guards (Kevin Bacon) and they shoot him dead (if you saw the movie, you wouldnt have really blamed them. To make a long story short. A local priest (Robert De Niro ) who had befriended the boys chose to lie for the now murders and claimed they had been with him at a Celtics game at the time of the murder (months earlier) to back up his claim he provided all three ticket stubs. The guys had not been with him, it had been months since the game and yet the priest was able to provide the stubs.
Wasnt it months later that JAR turned over his movie stub? How did this young man still have that stub? Could he have gotten it like the priest, through conspiracy?
The movie came out October 18, 1996....
Exactly. So why would you still have it? Unless you are a teenage girl who scrapbooks and the movie had some sentimental significance, why would anyone keep a movie ticket stub? Odd "coincidence" for it to turn up in a pocket.
he was placed in Boulder(evening of the murder IIRC) by a witness ,right?i forgot now who the witness was,a neighbor?did he change his statement or something and why did LE forget about it
Exactly. So why would you still have it? Unless you are a teenage girl who scrapbooks and the movie had some sentimental significance, why would anyone keep a movie ticket stub? Odd "coincidence" for it to turn up in a pocket.