UKGuy,
Perhaps Susan Stine had a visitor such as Judith P, and was called out on it. Perhaps this is the reason to tell BPD. One has to questions her motives here. After all it’s highly likely it was her son that rode off in the night on the bike. There is so much going on behind the scenes here of which me know not of.
Since BR, stated in his own words “He was basically just getting on with my life, you know.” How did he know so much detail about the crime? Why the basement? Where did his bike go that night? What is his explanation? A shrug of the shoulders?
What versions of events do you believe in and why? I’d love to hear it.
They are currently airing more Jonbenet movies and Dr. Phil w/BR again in my area. Makes one wonder about JR’s health. JAR rearing his head from out of the darkness these past 25 years? Something is up. Hint, hint, hint.
I think it would be awesome if we could get DS dna. DS and BR have remained friends to this day. I am sure (if a cover needs to be made) then they have already got their plot down. Again, where did the bike go? Or, perhaps somebody got that covered for them?
I understand you place importance on the stained pajama pants found in JB bedroom. No doubt it is significant especially if the chocolates were also covered in the same dna poo. This would explain the case of events taking place in the bedroom verses downstairs in let’s say the Sunroom.
I say, I will place us back at the bowl of nonchalant bowl of pineapple.
As for where are the fecally stained pajamas, I shall quote you:
Foreign Faction, Who Really Kidnapped JonBenet, James Kolar, pages 370 - 371
There were other police reports in the files that documented what I thought could be viewed as related behavior. CSIs had written about finding a pair of pajama bottoms in JonBenét’s bedroom that contained fecal material. They were too big for her and were thought to belong to Burke.
Kolar can only have sourced this information from police reports or by interview of an actual investigator or psychologist, etc other than directly from Burke Ramsey's mouth?
And, I reply ...
Must be in the evidence locker, hey?
Rain on my Parade,
Burke knew far more about JonBenet's death, including insider details that could not have been sourced from the Media.
A telling hint takes place during the 911 call when some people believe they can hear Burke Ramsey saying, "What did you find?"
Dr. Phil asked him about this.
DP: Did you speak those words?
BR: No.
DP: Were you there when that call was made?
BR: No.
DP: So you were not there and you did not speak those words?
BR: That's correct.
DP: It's also been speculated that your father can be heard yelling, "We're not speaking to you."
BR: Definitely don't remember that. I don't know. Unless someone erased my memory or something.
Burke's last answer says he has contracted ramnesia, but as per his previous answers He was not there, so why develop ramnesia?
From a staging POV why would Burke Ramsey think there is anything to find in the basement, why not JonBenet's bedroom? i.e. does Burke Ramsey know JonBenet is in the basement because he placed her there?
This suggests Burke Ramsey was involved in the death of his sister and helped to stage the wine-cellar crime-scene.
DS may have been involved with him returning home on BR's bike. DS might be a critical witness necessitating JR employing Glenn Stine? It would be interesting to hear what Susan Stine said to the Grand Jury, why was she called to testify?
With no DS involved, BR might have visited the basement with JonBenet, then returned upstairs to JonBenet's bedroom?
Alternately, after snacking pineapple, JonBenet and Burke Ramsey retire to her bedroom, i.e. a repeat of Christmas Eve, what follows is open to interpretation, e.g. sexual assault, head blow, asphyxiation?
They likely took place in JonBenet's bedroom, with the possibility some occurred in the basement?
We can link Burke Ramsey to the wine-cellar via his touch-dna deposited on JonBenet's bloodstained Pink Barbie Nightgown, i.e. either the dna was deposited in her bedroom, or the dna was deposited the wine-cellar, even possibly the breakfast bar?
If you accept Kolar's/CSIs opinion, then Burke Ramsey can be directly linked to JonBenet's bedroom, not such a large leap, since we know they shared bedrooms regularly, as recent as Christmas Eve.
We can also link Burke Ramsey to the Breakfast Bar via his fingerprints on the teaglass and pineapple bowl. JonBenet links indirectly to the breakfast bar via the pineapple found in her stomach.
So that is a stronger circumstantial nexus that that of any of the parents, only Patsy might match BR here?
Why are the pajamas left on JonBenet's bedroom floor important? Because as per Kolar/CSIs opinion that they contained Fecal Material. Meaning we can test to identify who deposited the fecal material. Similarly for the other smeared items in JonBenet's bedroom!
What color are they
Do they match the color of the pair worn by Burke Ramsey Christmas Morning, as above?
Other aspects related to the pajamas containing Fecal Material is the evidence of a housekeeper who said excrement the size of a grapefruit was once smeared on the young girl's bed sheets.
Linda Hoffman-Pugh said: "After they sealed off JonBenet's room, the crime scene technicians went through it, they apparently found faeces smeared on a box of candy she had got for Christmas."
Foreign Faction: Who Really Kidnapped JonBenet? by A. James Kolar; pages 367-70:, Excerpt
"I had reviewed an investigator’s report that documented a 1997 interview with former Ramsey nanny - housekeeper Geraldine Vodicka, who stated that Burke had smeared feces on the walls of a bathroom during his mother’s first bout with cancer. She told investigators that Nedra Paugh, who was visiting the Ramsey home at the time, had directed her to clean up the mess.
There were other police reports in the files that documented what I thought could be viewed as related behavior. CSIs had written about finding a pair of pajama bottoms in JonBenet's bedroom that contained fecal material. They were too big for her and were thought to belong to Burke."
So we might have a Behavioral Pattern here, one that could indicate intimidation, this is a conclusion I reached after amending JonBenet's Victim Profile, a previous summary is on websleuths.
So for those interested in a BDI theory, can you exclude a DS linked instance, what would be the criteria, having done so what might be the possible sequence of events leading upto and beyond JonBenet's death?
Foreign Faction: Who Really Kidnapped JonBenet? by A. James Kolar; pages 367-70:, Excerpt
The second important event to occur that winter involved additional discoveries that were related to the behavioral symptoms of a childhood disorder.
While working on the written case outline that was completed in October 2006, I became aware of a childhood behavioral disorder that revolved around the issue of sexually aggressive children. I learned about clinical research that had been conducted on the topic of children with a behavioral disorder commonly referred to as “Sexual Behavior Problems”, or “SBP.”
i.e. is JonBenet's death a climax in someone elses bizarre scenario, does it end with the emission of Fecal Matter, and the smearing of JonBenet's Candy Box, or are these events reversed?
Kolar's outline regarding Sexual Behavior Problems (SBP) was, IMO polite or restrained, particularly if you consider it in light of the above observed Behavioral Patterns, i.e what was really going on?
Is it possible that JonBenet's internal injury was another behavioral pattern repeating, e.g. chronic internal scarring, was it postmortem, happening after the pajamas containing Fecal Material were left discarded on the floor or did it coincide with the internal injury?
Did the smearing on the Candy Box then follow or precede the above speculation?
Speculating, did Burke Ramsey move a redressed JonBenet down to the basement to construct a distance between himself and JonBenet, or did his parents enact this?
Additions to JonBenet's Victim Profile include a timeline, an outline of her abuser(s), Sleepover victimisation, Sibling rivalry, Prior acts of sexual assault, Other acts of physical violence, leading to the tentative conclusion that JonBenet was the victim of inter-family sexual abuse.
For the record:
Ramsey’s attorney Lin Wood publicly stated: “In May of 1999, the Boulder District Attorney and the Boulder Police Department publicly confirmed that Burke Ramsey was not a suspect or even a possible suspect.
Lets hope so, even better fecal samples were taken, it might break the case and bring Justice for JonBenet!And, I reply ...
Must be in the evidence locker, hey?
.
Last edited: