I haven't discussed this case from the beginning as many of you have so I'm curious, is it the assumption the Grand Jury evidence and testimony contains previously unknown information? Even after all of the books by insiders in the investigation, is it the belief of most of the posters here that there is more to be learned from the release of the Grand Jury proceedings and conclusions?
Not trying to start something....genuinely curious.
There really isn't any way to tell what was in the indictment unless it is made public and to me irrefutably knowing what was in the indictment is important. Releasing it will remove all doubt of exactly what was said. Secondly, to me, it is direct proof the Ramseys and their team have lied about no indictment being handed down.