The point being, is it better to have a very short time on earth and eventually die in pain from Cancer or endure treatment like say, like Farrah Fawcett and live a lot longer then anyone thought was possible and do everything possible to live.
I can tell you right now, homopatic(sp) herbs and such is not going to treat or cure cancer or put into remission. Cancer has been proven to respond to Chemo and radiation.
Ask her family how they feel about her being "alive" walking, talking and being part of life because of treatment for her cancer.
A friend of a friend who knew someone for many years, saw the person literally "waste" away because he had cancer that could not be treated, he lasted till the end, about 6 months. That is 6.5 years less then without treatment for ovarian cancer.
So unfortunately, there is short term cancer, and long term cancer treatment. This boy is differently the later and has a chance to live, unlike others.
Again, I agree with the Judge, I would have made the same decision, because honestly, if I ruled differently, I don't know how I could live with myself knowing that I literally sentenced this child to "sure" death. Even now it may be too late for the boy to benefit from treatment anyways. Why you ask, because he should have started treatment a a lot sooner then a court decision.
I need to look in the mirror now and then........and I could not live with my decision let alone look in the mirror if I ruled for this boys death.
I watched my Dad die of Colon cancer. He had about 10 surgeries and endured chemo for a year. Those treatments prolonged his life but they didn't make his life better. The majority of the six years he fought cancer, he was either in the hospital or in the bed sick. I think each family should have the right to decide for themselves what is best.