gardenhart
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2008
- Messages
- 814
- Reaction score
- 0
While I agree 100% w JBean that we are all ultimately responsible for our own choices, reportedly CA persisted against even KC's misgivings and better judgment, in pressuring her to not adopt out Caylee. On one level I can understand this--as I was nearly faced myself w this heartwrenching dilemma involving my own very young single, struggling daughter, and her child (my granddaughter). Thankfully, before that plan could ever be implemented, my daughter reconsidered, had moved on to Plan B and moved where they could both live and receive help from her dad.
In this case, despite discouraging KC from doing what KC felt was best and had every right to do, she never herself totally assumed the role of guardian nor relieved KC altogether of the responsibility. That too is understandable, given that she allowed KC to continue living in the home there with them--and would otherwise stand accused of "stealing" Caylee (or her affections) away from KC. It's also not hard to grasp how KC might have felt defensive about her attempts to parent, since CA had reportedly criticized KC openly in front of friends about other things. Nor is it hard to understand on CA's part why, altho it was occasionally fun to be Caylee's "favorite," to feel needed and loved and relive those earlier fulfilling years when KC was mallable and compliant, when it wasn't inconvenient, on some level she must have also deeply resented KC's irresponsibility, freedom and apparent oblivion (not to mention deceit) as CA was the one coming home tired from work to more responsibilities--while KC continues her carefree lifestyle, escaping what was "supposed" to be her responsibility, partying into the night. Nor how she might have--at those difficult times it didn't suit her--regretted absolving or talking KC into shirking or foisting all of her responsibilities upon her, or just been hoping KC might eventually step up. It should also be pointed out that even tho KC was by then an "adult," their mother-daughter dynamic is a force to be reckoned w and the approval/disapproval factor inescapable. Thus "KC's" choice of whether or not to relinquish parental responsibility was in a very real sense subject to the silent (and more likely not so silent) judgment or permission of her mother. And CA by now discovers it is she who is having to make the sacrifices for "KC's" choice. We can say KC was capable of making her own decision, yet when your mother chastises or condemns you for that decision, that is a powerful influence that should not be underestimated. None of this is to excuse, only to help us understand. Because in the end, I think few would argue that KC's actual choice (vs CA's) would have undoubtedly turned out better for little Caylee. And in the absence of real true agreement between them what Caylee was left w instead was theoretically shared but oftentimes a blurring of parental responsibilities. What we do know is what was testified to in interviews (see 8/25/08 document dump) released long ago and well substantiated by multiple and reliable sources. JMO
"Four hundred pages of documents released by police in the case of a missing Orlando toddler reveal that her mother wanted to give her up for adoption before she was born, but her grandmother convinced her not to."
"Court documents show 22-year-old Casey Anthony, the mother of missing Florida toddler, Caylee Anthony, wanted to give the girl up for adoption before she was born.
"Documents released by prosecutors Monday show Casey Anthony's mother insisted that she keep the child."
"Casey Anthony wanted to give up her unborn child for adoption. But those plans were nixed by her mother, who insisted she keep the baby... Childhood friend Kiomarie Torres Cruz said that during Casey Anthony's pregnancy, she wanted to put the baby up for adoption. Cruz told Anthony she would be interested in adopting the unborn child because she couldn't have children herself. Cruz said she thought Anthony was bipolar. At times, Anthony would ask her something one day, and then would not remember later that she asked the question."
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/...,2732067.story
http://www.necn.com/Boston/Nation/Re...219761697.html
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,410865,00.html
http://www.baynews9.com/content/36/2...26/376590.html
http://www.wctv.tv/home/headlines/27429754.html
http://www.clickorlando.com/news/172...orlpn&psp=news
http://video.aol.com/video-detail/do...ase/2032023385
http://media.myfoxorlando.com/photog...dexGallery.htm
Unless I'm not remembering correctly, the only source of the story that Cindy forced Casey to have the baby rather than putting it up for adoption was Kiomarie and I don't know how reliable she is as a source. She claimed she wanted to adopt the baby, which doesn't make a lot of sense. Isn't she the same age as Casey? How many unmarried 19 year olds would be allowed to adopt a child much less want to adopt one?
Again, perhaps someone can verify whether my memory is correct, but I thought Jesse said Casey opted not to put the baby up for adoption.
I completely agree with your statement above about Cindy not totally assuming the role of guardian or taking responsibility for Caylee. Cindy was the only one in the house working full time. I just get the impression that no one gave poor little Caylee a lot of attention.
One thing I haven't understood is the implication that Cindy needed to watch Caylee every night. My daughter was always in bed asleep by 7 pm when she was a toddler. Yes, someone needed to be home but how much care would a little one require when she's asleep?