Soulmagent
On Time Out
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2008
- Messages
- 9,485
- Reaction score
- 11,140
Then she could be compelled to testify .My interpretation was that the daughter told LE what the phone calls between her and the judge were about.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Then she could be compelled to testify .My interpretation was that the daughter told LE what the phone calls between her and the judge were about.
This was where my mind went when reading about placing the calls. That he manually typed in the number and when (and possibly what?) it popped up as a saved contact on the Judge's phone, the murder commenced.Stines could have manually dialed his daughters phone number. JMO
I honestly don’t know why, but from the very beginning, This case has been giving me vibes of Aaron Harper and Jack Cooper. Best friends for life that ended in murder
yep, seems entirely possible to me.As I stated before... That case ruined 2 families. So.very.sad!
However, now I am wondering since the "kidnap" statement... Did he actually think that the judge was maybe helping his wife and daughter "get away" from him? Possibly the judge was helping the wife to leave... Maybe there was trouble in their marriage and the daughter reached out to the judge for help... His being quiet/troubled for some time before this hints to me that there was possibly several issues at play here.
about 46:00 is the statement "They were trying to kidnap my wife and kid"
Sorry I was watching the live video and the previous timestamp was as I was watching it.
That isn't entirely true. She is a minor if what i understand is correct. So it would really depend on who wants to compel her, for what, and how/when.Then she could be compelled to testify .
I will find it shocking if she does not end up on the stand. She would be a witness to whatever state of mind he was in , the only way I see her not being called is if the defense does not call her.Then she could be compelled to testify .
This was where my mind went when reading about placing the calls. That he manually typed in the number and when (and possibly what?) it popped up as a saved contact on the Judge's phone, the murder commenced.
I think there are so many reasons that the daughter & judge could have had each other's phone numbers. Way more innocent reasons than nefarious ones. (Emergency contact, babysitting, school/team sponsorships, families were supposedly friends so even just that, etc.)
I think MS decided something was fishy & let himself stew for awhile until he created something in his mind. It festered & he decided an execution was in order.
I was also kind of astonished to hear that LE had not yet questioned the daughter without a parent (her mom) present.
Imo.
Stines said they are trying to kidnap both his wife and kid. He didn't say "he" but rather "they".
Who is "they" and why was both his wife and kid the alleged targets. If Stines felt that more than one person was a threat to his wife and kid why did he only shoot the judge and immediately surrender?
Something just isn't adding up here. JMO.
[bbm]He did say it's his understanding one of them mentioned hearing someone say help or help me.. but it didn't sound like Judge Mullins.
It sounds like he was hesitant at first to comment on things he had no direct connection to, but then the attorney reminded him it was a preliminary hearing and hearsay was allowed. It is his job as the lead to know the ins and outs of what was going on so for him to struggle so much with stating things that were known to this point did seem odd. Maybe it was just being leery not to misstate things he didn't hear himself or see himself?
could be MS texted secretary (if that is who she was) to inquire if the judge had anything going on that afternoon or had time to meet with him. Secretary texts back nope he has nothing major this afternoon, tells judge MS wants a minute with you. So then the judge says Do you need to see me privately?
I wouldn't be surprised if we find out that Stines said something different.I would caution folks to put too much emphasis on the "kidnap" statement and trying to parse the words. It was as I understand, double hearsay at least, so perhaps not too reliable as to whether those were the actual words used.
Well the Sheriff is the one who is in charge of the security. Law enforcement routinely carry firearms into courthouses passed the security checkpoints. They are just not seen as being a threat.What I find interesting about this particular shooting, is that most courthouses now, if not all, make people go through metal detectors. The security guards won't let people in the courthouse with weapons.
But, the Sheriff doesn't have to go through any security. He is allowed in the area with his weapons.
That is why I think that a lot of places that screen for weapons, are not actually targeting the most likely threats, in a work place environment. The threat will be internal, rather than external.