Hot Dogs
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2008
- Messages
- 1,780
- Reaction score
- 1
I have asked before and not seen any input from anyone, but I don't think RK will even be called as a witness. There is nothing to be gained by introducing a witness whose testimony does not lead one way or the other to defendants guilt or innocence.
But wouldn't either side want to call him as a witness to (at the minimum) hear him say in his own words that he, and he alone, was the person who discovered the remains on Dec. 11?
If the claims that RK is "daisy chained" to Casey turn out to be true how does that help the defense?
Because the "daisy chain" is not to be assumed without direct questioning of the MR, and exploration of it (with MR on the stand) could reveal that others are involved in Caylee's death, or possibly obstruction of justice?