- Joined
- Nov 27, 2011
- Messages
- 2,394
- Reaction score
- 2,494
ok I missed this because this case moves so fast. who is the LL that saw Lucas alone?
We dont know the LL identity.
The VI only told us that EG's LL was the last one to see Lucas.
ok I missed this because this case moves so fast. who is the LL that saw Lucas alone?
I am wondering if it was worded like that because maybe one call was a call in and another a call out? For example, maybe someone called her but she didn't answer and then called them back an hour later? If it was the LL calling and she was already gone, she might have ignored his call and waited until she was on her way back home to return the call in case he wanted to come by for some reason.
I know that DHS reports are confidential but I can't help but wonder what actions, if any, DHS initiated to investigate abuse committed against Lucas. DHS was contacted more than once about this. :banghead:
When it was discovered that two phone calls were made. BTW, I think your scenario is most likely the accurate one. I can't help but wonder if one of her friends was disposing of Lucas while she was at the OG. One call to the friend to let them know that she is out of the house and one call from the friend to let her know that the deed has been done and she can now return to the home. Just my :twocents:
We dont know the LL identity.
The VI only told us that EG's LL was the last one to see Lucas.
It kinda seems like they didn't do anything at all. JMO but I know people who get reported for this or that and the people on the hotline take the info, but the person reported never gets contacted at all, let alone investigated.I know that DHS reports are confidential but I can't help but wonder what actions, if any, DHS initiated to investigate abuse committed against Lucas. DHS was contacted more than once about this. :banghead:
The LL hasn't been interviewed or named on MSM so we are not aloud to name or "sleuth" them here.We dont know the LL identity.
The VI only told us that EG's LL was the last one to see Lucas.
When it was discovered that two phone calls were made. BTW, I think your scenario is most likely the accurate one. I can't help but wonder if one of her friends was disposing of Lucas while she was at the OG. One call to the friend to let them know that she is out of the house and one call from the friend to let her know that the deed has been done and she can now return to the home. Just my :twocents:
Another thing I have been wondering about. Why would JH take Lucas to his family in NM covered in bruises? Was he trying to get Lucas away from EG for awhile? JH would have to of known his family would question the brusies. It wasn't like there was only 1. He had numerous bruises.
I guess it's called a spoiler. A lot of them have this. I wonder if hers does. They stand out to me, like eyelashes on a VW bug do.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/RARE-OEM-0...318495?hash=item2853110e1f:g:4SAAAOSwHLNZS3g0
I got really hot under the collar when I realized those bruises are from May and in October she alleges to the court that she is taking care of Lucas as an example of decent parenting! Even if I'm wrong and the bruise pictures came in November, those May allegations were on file when the court case is heard in October. Why didn't the court catch that? I understand why in theory, but, just, WTF. It really isn't the courts job to cross reference, that ball was so unfortunately dropped by JH, but there must be a way to fix that so the court would have to at least ASK the parties if they are aware of pending or past DCF cases.
A national child abuse database doesn't seem so hard to implement. It doesn't have to be public.
eta..sorry, this has nothing to do with the drugs part, I guess your post just made me think of those court documents
edited again to add...I don't mean to judge JH...maybe he was never even thrown the ball, I don't know if he had direct knowledge of the issues surrounding the custody of EG's older boys or direct knowledge of all calls to DCF regarding Lucas.
I know that DHS reports are confidential but I can't help but wonder what actions, if any, DHS initiated to investigate abuse committed against Lucas. DHS was contacted more than once about this. :banghead:
This makes me think he believed EG. Is Lucas his oldest? If so, she's more experienced, she's a mother and I'm sure she gas-lighted (gas-lit?) him about it: Kids get bruises! What are you accusing me of! How dare you! Don't leave him with me if you think I'm so horrible. Lucas, I'm not mean to you...AM I? No, of course not, you just got rug burn with your cousins, remember?
I need to go clean my brain out, now.
Why he believes EG over his own family and his own child, I cannot answer and maybe he can't either, yet.
I’m not 100% sure anyone could identify a child accurately they had only seen once, especially “peeking” out of a window. I didn’t hear or read anything about this sighting until very recentIy. thought that LE in an interview said the last confirmed sighting was on 2/11 when EG introduced the kids to the neighbor children.
I think both scenarios make sense but the 2/11 date would give her time. Time to think smoke more mj, think, get high, clean up, think, get high, come up with a story, test story and fit some time into her “soccer mom” fake life. Think get high sleep, think some more. When she was ready with a solid fairy tale she ran to neighbors, probably after she smoked so she didn’t have the shakes. Then let the whole story roll.
Nothing, and most of those who should have nurtured this little boy, have good intent. The distant family might be the exception.
This is going togo on a lot longer than I had hoped. I don’t understand the evil in some people. in some people. I’ve seen it, I know it, but I don’t understand it. People have children and don’t think that cute baby is going to grow up and need love and attention. In Lucas’ case he needed an extraordinary amount of love and care due to his disability. He fidnt get it. Period. No one close to him gave him the basics. This is so very very sad.