I had posted the (unpopular) thought in last thread that I gave EG credit for leading the PI to Lucas.
BUT...having read a few versions of how finding Lucas went down, I got to thinking.
Did she physically lead the PI to the remains or did he read her clues and body language so well that she figuratively lead him to the remains (with her words). People can be lead to things in different ways.
Anyway, I take back any credit I gave her...she is not deserving. IMO
Another thought...I see discussion about the darkness on that evening.
#1) Do we know it was dark when she disposed of him? I know it has been suggested such, but is it a fact?
#2) If it was dark, wouldn't her car headlights be enough light for her dastardly deed?
#3) Is there any indication, from where he was, that she physically went under the bridge to dispose of him or is it possible she simply dumped him off the side of the bridge and the rains pushed him further under the bridge/culvert?
ETA: I see Pink answered this earlier stating he had to have been placed there.
So many questions.
I believe at the end of the last thread someone said they had pictures of the culvert and did we want to see them here? Yes, I would like to see them. If they were already posted, I may have missed it.