KY - Breonna Taylor, 26, fatally shot multiple times by LE, Louisville, 13 Mar 2020 #2

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves



If that warrant was BS then that means they forced themselves into a home without permission. That wouldve given the bf to fire back at them
I've always heard if you shoot someone trying to break in make sure you pull them inside. But that is my opinion.

Louisville has a lot of crime issues. Here in Lexington the police do not use no knock warrants. MOO
 
Okay, then. Makes no sense to me. Breonna will probably never get justice. Her family must be devastated again that those who conspired to raid that apartment are not responsible for the chain of events that killed her. JMHO.
 



If that warrant was BS then that means they forced themselves into a home without permission. That wouldve given the bf to fire back at them
Well, no. The officers serving the warrant were allowed to rely upon it. But also remember that while they did initially charge Walker with firing at the police, those charges were dropped because he fired in self defense. Now, there is no question the officers who applied for the warrant on Breonna's apartment lied and misled in the affidavit (these were not the officers that carried out the search warrant however). But they probably could have gotten the warrant without embellishing the facts. So it may be correct to say that the lying on the warrant itself didn't result in her death. Although I could probably make an argument that the lies made it more urgent that it be served that night. The two officers do still face some charges for falsifying info on the warrant affidavit.
 
24aug_breanna.jpg

The two cops who actually shot Taylor—Jonathan Mattingly and Myles Cosgrove—were never charged. Prosecutors said they did not know their colleagues had lied to obtain the warrant. Instead, the Justice Department blamed the four other officers for Taylor’s death. But on Thursday, Judge Simpson disagreed.

“While the indictment alleges that Jaynes and Meany set off a series of events that ended in Taylor’s death, it also alleges that [Taylor’s boyfriend, Walker] disrupted those events when he decided to open fire” on the police, Simpson wrote. Walker’s “decision to open fire,” he added, “is the legal cause of her death.”

The ruling effectively reduced some of the felony charges against Jaynes and Meany, which had carried a maximum sentence of life in prison, to misdemeanors. But officers are not totally off the hook: The judge refused to dismiss a charge against Jaynes for conspiracy and a charge against Meany for lying to the FBI. Goodlett, who pleaded guilty to federal charges, is expected to testify against them at their trials. A fourth former officer, Brett Hankison, also faces a retrial for federal charges in October.

Taylor’s family said prosecutors plan to appeal this week’s ruling. “Obviously we are devastated,” the family wrote in a statement to the Associated Press. “The only thing we can do at this point is continue to be patient…we will continue to fight until we get full justice for Breonna Taylor.”
 
24aug_breanna.jpg

The two cops who actually shot Taylor—Jonathan Mattingly and Myles Cosgrove—were never charged. Prosecutors said they did not know their colleagues had lied to obtain the warrant. Instead, the Justice Department blamed the four other officers for Taylor’s death. But on Thursday, Judge Simpson disagreed.

“While the indictment alleges that Jaynes and Meany set off a series of events that ended in Taylor’s death, it also alleges that [Taylor’s boyfriend, Walker] disrupted those events when he decided to open fire” on the police, Simpson wrote. Walker’s “decision to open fire,” he added, “is the legal cause of her death.”

The ruling effectively reduced some of the felony charges against Jaynes and Meany, which had carried a maximum sentence of life in prison, to misdemeanors. But officers are not totally off the hook: The judge refused to dismiss a charge against Jaynes for conspiracy and a charge against Meany for lying to the FBI. Goodlett, who pleaded guilty to federal charges, is expected to testify against them at their trials. A fourth former officer, Brett Hankison, also faces a retrial for federal charges in October.

Taylor’s family said prosecutors plan to appeal this week’s ruling. “Obviously we are devastated,” the family wrote in a statement to the Associated Press. “The only thing we can do at this point is continue to be patient…we will continue to fight until we get full justice for Breonna Taylor.”
The officers that fired the shots that killed Breonna did nothing wrong. They were carrying out a search warrant based upon the information provided to them. The fault here maybe lay with the federal prosecutors and the way that they chose to charge this, and I honestly wondering if it wasn't intentional, at least in part. Regardless, Meany and jaynes should still be facing felony charges in STATE court, but that case was taken over by the DOJ. It appears that NOTHING is going well in this case.
 

Two former Louisville police officers involved in Breonna Taylor raid have been indicted again

U.S. District Court Judge Charles Simpson's Aug. 22 ruling, in essence, found that the initial gunshot Taylor's boyfriend, Kenneth Walker, fired at police was the "legal cause of her death" — not an improper warrant that authorized the raid.

Jaynes and Meany are accused of providing and lying about false information in a search warrant used by police to burst into Taylor's house, resulting in her death.

In the new indictments, the prosecutors amended the original indictments, adding additional allegations in hopes of getting around the judge's ruling.
Justice is coming babygirl!
 

Opening statements are set to begin Monday in the federal retrial of Brett Hankison, a former Louisville police officer accused of violating the civil rights of Breonna Taylor, her boyfriend and their neighbors in 2020, when Taylor was shot and killed in a botched police raid.
 
From a legal standpoint, I am very interested to see how this plays out. Hankison's actions that night were absolutely atrocious and inexcusable. It is a miracle he didn't kill anyone. But his prosecution has really been bungled in my opinion.
 
From a legal standpoint, I am very interested to see how this plays out. Hankison's actions that night were absolutely atrocious and inexcusable. It is a miracle he didn't kill anyone. But his prosecution has really been bungled in my opinion.
Reading an article from WLKY and I'm shocked at this part...
"Those witnesses took the stand in the first federal trial, but on Tuesday, two new witnesses and tactics were apparent by prosecutors.

Jurors heard for the first time ever from a woman who lived above Taylor. She testified that police did not announce themselves prior to busting down Taylor’s apartment door, but she heard the gunshots and Kenneth Walker, Taylor's boyfriend, crying for help.

Also in court, prosecutors brought physical evidence from the scene, showing jurors a blind with a bullet hole from Taylor's neighbor's apartment."

As an attorney, maybe you'll have some kind of legal explanation but it's BAFFLING to me they didn't have the neighbors testify or show evidence from their apartments in the first trial. To sum it up as briefly as possible, you can cut through a lot of the "controversial" or "debatable" parts of the entire situation by emphasizing a 5 year old child, who lived in a different apartment, was nearly shot and killed.
 
Reading an article from WLKY and I'm shocked at this part...
"Those witnesses took the stand in the first federal trial, but on Tuesday, two new witnesses and tactics were apparent by prosecutors.

Jurors heard for the first time ever from a woman who lived above Taylor. She testified that police did not announce themselves prior to busting down Taylor’s apartment door, but she heard the gunshots and Kenneth Walker, Taylor's boyfriend, crying for help.

Also in court, prosecutors brought physical evidence from the scene, showing jurors a blind with a bullet hole from Taylor's neighbor's apartment."

As an attorney, maybe you'll have some kind of legal explanation but it's BAFFLING to me they didn't have the neighbors testify or show evidence from their apartments in the first trial. To sum it up as briefly as possible, you can cut through a lot of the "controversial" or "debatable" parts of the entire situation by emphasizing a 5 year old child, who lived in a different apartment, was nearly shot and killed.
The additional witness saying they didn't knock in my opinion is irrelevant. The officers had a no-knock warrant, so they didn't have to knock. But they claim they did, and I think the evidence clearly supports that. The bullet in the other apartment doesn't support the civil rights violation charge since he is charged with violating Breonna's rights. I'm not real comfortable with this prosecution.
 
  • Like
Reactions: byo
The additional witness saying they didn't knock in my opinion is irrelevant. The officers had a no-knock warrant, so they didn't have to knock. But they claim they did, and I think the evidence clearly supports that. The bullet in the other apartment doesn't support the civil rights violation charge since he is charged with violating Breonna's rights. I'm not real comfortable with this prosecution.
A quote from the article I linked says: "Now, Hankison is only charged with violating the civil rights of Breonna Taylor and her three neighbors" (when referencing KW's removed charge)

I wasn't making any comment on the knocking statement but rather that her neighbors, who had shots fired into their homes as well, were not witnesses during the first trial.
 
Last edited:
Prosecutors also showed testimony Nobles gave to a federal grand jury where he said he wouldn't have fired blindly into Taylor's windows “because this is not Iraq.”

The Taylor shooting made “police look bad” and detoured his career in policing, Nobles testified.

“The dream of living out a life and getting promoted to lieutenant is gone,” he said. “I’m leaving the minute my 20-year (retirement eligibility) hits.”

Hankison is expected to testify Monday. In previous testimony, he has argued that he was making a snap decision after he believed his fellow officers were being fired on by someone inside with a rifle.
 

The jury found Hankison not guilty of violating the civil rights of three of Taylor's neighbors, who lived in an adjacent apartment, according to Louisville ABC affiliate WHAS. However, jurors have deadlocked on a second count, which charged Hankison with violating Taylor's civil rights. The judge has instructed jurors to keep deliberating on that count.
 
  • Like
Reactions: byo

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
105
Guests online
195
Total visitors
300

Forum statistics

Threads
608,897
Messages
18,247,372
Members
234,492
Latest member
Michael1
Back
Top