girlhasnoname
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2018
- Messages
- 10,057
- Reaction score
- 128,448
I believe they know much more than they've shared (gag order) and I think they are dotting all the i's and crossing all the t's.IMO Blunt force trauma would have definitely been determined during the autopsy. Strangulation most likely as well. Her body was identified by her fingerprints and tattoos, which IMO says her body was in very good condition when found, opposed to badly decomposed like many think a body should be after being in the ground for that amount of time. The ground was cold for a good portion of that time and may have been shaded as well by the shed and trees from the looks of pictures I seen. If her tattoos were recognizable at autopsy, IMO any bruising from something such as strangulation would likely be as well.
If it was known during the autopsy that Savanna was killed by homicidal violence, do you think he would have been charged with murder by now?
Four people went into that house that night, one did not come out alive. They are in no rush to press additional charges yet, and I think they are investigating everyone's story and timeline ie. other people present at the home, the home where Savannah's body was recovered, etc. to the 10th degree, as well they should.