Shame the hair they had was Eugenie's. Was hoping it belonged to her ex.
Wonder if Tommy will go to jail for the 2 murders
I hope Tommy gets convicted, too.
I have a bad feeling Eugenie's case will not be solved.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Shame the hair they had was Eugenie's. Was hoping it belonged to her ex.
Wonder if Tommy will go to jail for the 2 murders
I hope Tommy gets convicted, too.
I have a bad feeling Eugenie's case will not be solved.
Rodie posted on his page on the 21st that there's 3 more episodes now.
How would you like to spend more Tuesday nights with me? Well, you have me for 3 more Tuesdays after tonight. I'm not going away that fast now. Love ya'll too much. Just keep your TV's on Discovery Channel. You will see a preview for it in tonight's episode. I will be posting more info on it. I love surprising you!
Please like and share to let EVERYONE know.
Killing Fields is taking a break tonight, But don't worry, It will return next week. See you all then.I just watched the last episode where the cell mate told them what Tommy said and how Eugenie's ex had a pick up. The DVR isn't showing any more episodes so I wonder when they'll be on.
Just left a Bond Hearing for Tommy Francise. His RaggedE Azz was denied
The Man Behind The Badge, Rodie Sanchez
November 17 at 3:05pm ·
It's hard for me to imagine that she was attacked and all her credit cards and id fell out in one spot.
Unless I missed something and a whole purse was found, car/house keys, etc.
I was a little confused by that, too. At first, Rodie looked at the Major as if to say "he's full of it". Then the Major says, " I happen to know a detective spoke with you 18 years ago." After the call, there's an obvious edit, and we only hear Rodie say it was all over the papers. He didn't appear embarrassed to me, only PO'd.
Regarding collection of a surreptitious DNA sample, location might have presented a problem. Besides, they were able to learn a lot about the ex's attitude through the exchange, and I think they really wanted to see him in person and question him. IF DNA cleared the ex, then they keep looking.
Found this online. Can someone break it down for us? more importantly the last paragraph. Is he DNA allowed or not?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...4/schmidt_order-and-reasons.pdf?noredirect=on
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Michael Schmidt’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART. The swabbing of the Hummer door constituted a Fourth Amendment search. The remainder of Schmidt’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the officers’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART. All federal claims against the officers in their individual capacities are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The remainder of the officers’ summary judgment motion is DENIED.
New Orleans, Louisiana, April 18, 2017.
YES, I WAS SKIMMING THROUGH IT QUICKLY AND JUST WANTED CONFIRMATION ON MY OWN INTERPRETATION WHICH IS, THE DNA CAN NOT BE USED IN COURT.I'll try to read it later. You really have to read everything to know what the end means. Apparently her ex is trying to have the DNA thrown out. I mean really, LE could ship it (whatever DNA was on Eugenie) to Paragon to find the perp(s) thru GEDmatch; if they're not doing it already....
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...4/schmidt_order-and-reasons.pdf?noredirect=on
Okay, I have finally sat down and read the entire dissent, I see that this was solely to determine if the swabbing of the Hummer was a "search" under the Fourth Amendment. The courts conclude it was. So unfortunate that this was from April 2017 and I have not been able to find anything pertaining to this case more recently than that. I was really hoping to find if the DNA is going to be admissible or not. BUMMER!