CajunTattooer
Lady Sleuther
- Joined
- May 25, 2012
- Messages
- 141
- Reaction score
- 0
I think there is a poster here who is in contact with Charlene and can ask.
i've msged her on FB.
I think there is a poster here who is in contact with Charlene and can ask.
This needs to be emphasized so people don't get caught up again. This is the truck indentified as a Z71 by police that is still under investigation. It is traveling the same directions as Mickey and this is the only picture we have.
Picture #2 here: http://findmickeynow.com/
This makes sense of a lot of things:
- Charlie saying the initial photo wasn't 'the' truck, but to look for similar ones
- Polices spending the time to identify this truck as a Z71, but not identifying the other vehicles
- This truck traveled the same direction as Mickey, just behind her
- Neither Mickey or this truck are shown on the camera down the street (at least based on whats been released)
Given all that, this truck may be the key to the case.
I will be more circumspect in the future. Lesson to self, that's regarding doing this on the 'net.
In person, I can be pretty low-key and invisible and blend in. I didn't just go barging around. And had it been the car, I certainly wasn't going to stop and stare or go banging on the door. I would have left and called LE. And I didn't pull into the driveway, 8-track blaring, either.
A casual stroll from a few blocks away slouching with a low cap like the rest of the people and then use the corner of the eye.
Shouldn't have put it on the 'net.
When paris_paris shows up, tell her I'm ready for my spanking.
I've always been suspicious of the Patterson story. This just further proves that it's not connected.
Am I the only one who found the whole Patterson thing to be oddly suspicious since it was never reported to police when it occured and it only came out now? Not saying she is lying, but my reaction when I watched the news story about it when it aired was definitive skepticism. All I know is that if I had experienced something like that, I would have gone to the police (even if not right away, but when Mickey went missing) and I definitely wouldn't have plastered my name and face all over the media with some sort of psycho out there.
From yesterday's press conference, I did not get the impression that Mickey's bike suffered "significant damage."
To me, a bent fender and a dislodged tire is not considered significant damage.
A mangled frame would be significant damage.
jmo
Oh, this is so disheartening!!! Nothin? How is that possible?
A question is whether there is an identifying mark on the front door of this truck or if that's just an artifact of the poor quality video. If you look at the door, it looks like there is an arc that starts at the bottom of the door, goes up under the front window and maybe continues all the way to the headlight on that side. It's shape is like if you were looking up at the St Louis Arch. It may be real or it may be just caused by the bad video resolution.
http://abcnews.go.com/US/missing-lo...rd-significant/story?id=16458312#.T8Ze4sVXlIAMickey Shunick's recovered bike suffered significant damage to the rear tire, including a bent rim, authorities said today.
A question is whether there is an identifying mark on the front door of this truck or if that's just an artifact of the poor quality video. If you look at the door, it looks like there is an arc that starts at the bottom of the door, goes up under the front window and maybe continues all the way to the headlight on that side. It's shape is like if you were looking up at the St Louis Arch. It may be real or it may be just caused by the bad video resolution.
A question is whether there is an identifying mark on the front door of this truck or if that's just an artifact of the poor quality video. If you look at the door, it looks like there is an arc that starts at the bottom of the door, goes up under the front window and maybe continues all the way to the headlight on that side. It's shape is like if you were looking up at the St Louis Arch. It may be real or it may be just caused by the bad video resolution.
For those living in the Lafayette area: A while back was there not a woman (could have been a man) who had multiple DUI's and accidents with injuries caused to others and maybe even a fatality? From what I remember this woman was never incarcerated?? Trying to jog my memory. Louisiana has to be the absolute best state for Drunk Drivers, they go free! For all I know the court gives them a debit card to use at their local bars!
But what could she report him for? He offered her a ride, in broad daylight, and she voluntarily climbed into his truck. Then he, according to her, offered her 60 bucks for a sex act. She declined, and he dropped her off safely. What exactly could she have him arrested for?
Just because he said, supposedly, that he liked to drive around to look for pretty girls? I bet lots of men do that, routinely. That is not against the law.
How would Charlie have known before today that it wasn't "the" truck? Sounds like LE is sharing info with the family but not the public? If they knew that was the VOI why not say so?
Am I the only one who found the whole Patterson thing to be oddly suspicious since it was never reported to police when it occured and it only came out now? Not saying she is lying, but my reaction when I watched the news story about it when it aired was definitive skepticism. All I know is that if I had experienced something like that, I would have gone to the police (even if not right away, but when Mickey went missing) and I definitely wouldn't have plastered my name and face all over the media with some sort of psycho out there.
But what could she report him for? He offered her a ride, in broad daylight, and she voluntarily climbed into his truck. Then he, according to her, offered her 60 bucks for a sex act. She declined, and he dropped her off safely. What exactly could she have him arrested for?
Just because he said, supposedly, that he liked to drive around to look for pretty girls? I bet lots of men do that, routinely. That is not against the law.
It's quite possible they didn't see anything. If you're not looking for something, that can happen.
Sometimes I'll be riding as a passenger in someone else's vehicle and say "Where did that building come from?" when it had been under construction for weeks just outside of my peripheral vision while driving. When I'm driving, I see less of my total surroundings than when I'm a passenger.
Or they could have been talking or reading a text message or posting to facebook or eating fries out of the bag or looking for the phone charger or checking the nav screen or changing the station...a million things.
Most of us (Chicken Fried excepted) don't get into a vehicle to look for something. We're going to or coming from something else. What happens in the middle is not usually notable.
I will be more circumspect in the future. Lesson to self, that's regarding doing this on the 'net.
In person, I can be pretty low-key and invisible and blend in. I didn't just go barging around. And had it been the car, I certainly wasn't going to stop and stare or go banging on the door. I would have left and called LE. And I didn't pull into the driveway, 8-track blaring, either.
A casual stroll from a few blocks away slouching with a low cap like the rest of the people and then use the corner of the eye.
Shouldn't have put it on the 'net.
When paris_paris shows up, tell her I'm ready for my spanking.