Like many of us, I don't give a lot of credit to posters who come on, throw out major "clues" or supposed facts on their first post, and then disappear. However, I like where this has taken the train of thought. We need to be looking for clues that aren't so obvious.
Graffiti on WB bridge...we know graffiti is there. Most, if not all, is unrelated. But could the perp have left a tag there? Those who have been around websleuths for a while, have you seen instances where an individual themselves has disappeared without a trace, but a marker or tag that can be attributed to a killer was purposely left behind?
I went with the graffiti because so far all we have is that the bike was at WB Bridge. So someone connected with this disappearance (whether it be the disappearance of Mickey or just an unfortunate after-the-fact bike snatcher as some have proposed) was there. Other than the tire marks, there's got to be something else out there. (wishful thinking on my part, I admit)
If that pacman drawing was not across from BW's I would not give it a second thought. It's location and content make it worth a second thought to me. It is creepy.
Maybe the last one out should leave the lights on tonight.
I wonder if BW noticed when the pacman drawing first appeared?
I will just say that for those of you that are wondering about the june 4th posts I did take screen shots of the very very questionable ones as they bothered me greatly.
HTH
If that pacman drawing was not across from BW's I would not give it a second thought. It's location and content make it worth a second thought to me. It is creepy.
Maybe the last one out should leave the lights on tonight.
That pac man graffiti was on that wall on May 20th. That wall was painted very recently to get rid of the grafffiti that was there before. Sometime in the month of May the wall was painted fresh.
Ok, I am going to look at Chicken's photos and see if any of the graffiti there seems the same style as pac man.
This means something. Maybe related to Mickey's case, maybe not. Either way, it means something.
Pacman eats the big blue dot, which means he can eat the ghosts, which means game over for the ghost. The big dot is significant, as is the female ghost. Without pacman eating the big dot, this picture means something completely different.
Does anybody agree or disagree?
This means something. Maybe related to Mickey's case, maybe not. Either way, it means something.
Pacman eats the big blue dot, which means he can eat the ghosts, which means game over for the ghost. The big dot is significant, as is the female ghost. Without pacman eating the big dot, this picture means something completely different.
Does anybody agree or disagree?
If that pacman drawing was not across from BW's I would not give it a second thought. It's location and content make it worth a second thought to me. It is creepy.
Maybe the last one out should leave the lights on tonight.
I will just say that for those of you that are wondering about the june 4th posts I did take screen shots of the very very questionable ones as they bothered me greatly.
HTH