Elle*Bee
We're all just stories in the end.
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2013
- Messages
- 1,443
- Reaction score
- 5,509
The bullet hole was behind her ear, it would be a very awkward angle to hold a gun to your head and fire it. This was no suicide.
I agree.
The bullet hole was behind her ear, it would be a very awkward angle to hold a gun to your head and fire it. This was no suicide.
“Investigators firmly believe Nanette Krentel died by suicide, according to the investigator who spoke with HuffPost. They discount the theory that she was dead prior to the fire. As the source said, investigators believe Krentel could have set the fire, then stepped into the master bathroom and fired a fatal shot into her head.”“We know what happened to Nanette Krentel,” said an investigator. The only mystery is the coroner’s ruling.
11/08/2018
"...“We know what happened,” said the investigator, who wasn’t authorized to discuss the case and didn’t want to be named.
“There’s no mystery” about who is responsible for taking Krentel’s life, the investigator added. If anything, the source said, mystery surrounds a decision made in the days following Krentel’s 2017 death....
Krentel, a former preschool teacher, was found dead by firefighters picking through the remnants of the burned-out home she had shared with her husband, Steve Krentel. At the time, he was chief of St. Tammany Fire District 12. He’s since resigned....
Nanette Krentel’s body was burned beyond recognition. DNA was used to confirm her identity, a spokesman for the St. Tammany Parish Coroner’s Office told HuffPost at the time.
But the case took a sinister turn on July 21, 2017, when authorities announced that the autopsy showed Nanette Krentel died of a gunshot wound. Investigators also determined the fire had been intentionally set after fuel had been poured throughout the living room and master bedroom.
“We are diligently working on this case, and our detectives will continue to work until we have all of the answers,” Sheriff Randy Smith said at the time.
Dr. Charles Preston, the parish coroner, found neither soot nor ash in Krentel’s lungs, which he said clearly indicated she was dead before the fire. He ruled her death a homicide....
Investigators firmly believe Nanette Krentel died by suicide, according to the investigator who spoke with HuffPost. They discount the theory that she was dead prior to the fire. As the source said, investigators believe Krentel could have set the fire, then stepped into the master bathroom and fired a fatal shot into her head.
“We don’t understand the coroner’s ruling,” the source said. “This is a suicide.”...
The day the coroner announced he had classified the case a homicide, the sheriff released a statement saying he did not necessarily support that conclusion. But the sheriff backed off the next day, The Advocate reported in January.
It’s unclear whether law enforcement will continue to treat the case as a whodunnit. The sheriff’s office declined to discuss the unnamed investigator’s contention that authorities believe the death was suicide.
“The Nanette Krentel case is an active and ongoing investigation, and no additional information is available at this time,” said sheriff’s Capt. Scott Lee. ..."
Investigator: 'No Mystery' About Unsolved Slaying Of Louisiana Fire Chief's Wife | HuffPost
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Not sure why you think that is such an awkward angle. I can easily duplicate that angle. Consider that a person at the very moment of suicide is amped up on adrenaline and raises that gun to their head in a quick decisive motion because they want to do it while they have the nerve. The aim in that final moment may not be the best. But it’s not like Nanette had to hold the gun at an impossible angle - she didn’t.The bullet hole was behind her ear, it would be a very awkward angle to hold a gun to your head and fire it. This was no suicide.
Then they said the coroner said it couldn’t be suicide because she didn’t have soot in her airways. Hello? She likely lit a piece of paper as some kind of fuse that wouldn’t ignite the gasoline for a minute or two. Then she went in the bathroom and shot herself. Of course she wouldn’t breathe in any smoke!
Ok then let’s assume that she had a trail of gasoline and she lit one end of it and then walked quickly into the bathroom. Dropping a match into the gasoline is going to ignite it but it’s not going to explode because it’s not all collected in one place. But the bottom line is it’s very feasible and even likely, given the evidence, that she lit the gasoline and then quickly ran into the bathroom and Shot herself.I know this is someone's opinion and hardly fact, but if that was the case, investigators would have/will be able to determine that. IMO that scenario is farfetched and not at all guaranteed to have worked.
BBMOk then let’s assume that she had a trail of gasoline and she lit one end of it and then walked quickly into the bathroom. Dropping a match into the gasoline is going to ignite it but it’s not going to explode because it’s not all collected in one place. But the bottom line is it’s very feasible and even likely, given the evidence, that she lit the gasoline and then quickly ran into the bathroom and Shot herself.
No one would’ve shot her and then used a fire to cover up the fact that he Shot her, because we all know that a fire is not going to completely obliterate the fact that she was shot. The whole reason for the fire is to send a big old ironic F U to the fire chief husband.
Then she drops another one and makes sure it IS lit before moving on. It’s a silly argument to think there is no way that she could do something as simple as ignite a fire and then take a few steps into a bathroom without getting soot in her lungs.without getting all science-y, dropping a lit match into a trial of gasoline does not guarantee the gasoline will ignite.
I'm sorry I got into this discussion because I don't think Nanette shot herself.
The person who things are working out for is SK. How could he luck out to get a coroner to rule homicide despite no evidence that any person entered that property? It’s mind-boggling, and investigators on this case don’t understand why he would do that. But the end result is that SK gets her life insurance money (which he wouldn’t if it was ruled a suicide) and also the house insurance money (which he wouldn’t get if she set the fire herself). No wonder he went ahead and retired when they suspended him.BBM
I have to disagree on this point. There have been quite a few times people have been shot inside a house/building and then a fire was set by the perpetrator to cover up the crime. You are right that it seldom, if ever, works to conceal the gunshot wound.
Not making an accusation against anyone, but I can imagine someone with an extensive knowledge of fires believing he/she can stage the perfect conflagration to conceal a crime. If NK truly was murdered, the scheme is working out thus far for the perpetrator.
MOO
Good point about the insurance money. I do agree, too, that it's possible she set the fire and then committed suicide. I'm just not convinced she did commit suicide. I'm sure the coroner had good reason to come to the conclusion he did. But, the autopsy is only one portion of the investigation.The person who things are working out for is SK. How could he luck out to get a coroner to rule homicide despite no evidence that any person entered that property? It’s mind-boggling, and investigators on this case don’t understand why he would do that. But the end result is that SK gets her life insurance money (which he wouldn’t if it was ruled a suicide) and also the house insurance money (which he wouldn’t get if she set the fire herself). No wonder he went ahead and retired when they suspended him.
I would think he killed her, except there’s just too much evidence against it.
Coroners do get it wrong sometimes. It also would be interesting to know whether any kind of previous friendship existed between the coroner and SK that might have led to something shady.Good point about the insurance money. I do agree, too, that it's possible she set the fire and then committed suicide. I'm just not convinced she did commit suicide. I'm sure the coroner had good reason to come to the conclusion he did. But, the autopsy is only one portion of the investigation.
MOO
No one would’ve shot her and then used a fire to cover up the fact that he Shot her, because we all know that a fire is not going to completely obliterate the fact that she was shot. The whole reason for the fire is to send a big old ironic F U to the fire chief husband.
Ok then let’s assume that she had a trail of gasoline and she lit one end of it and then walked quickly into the bathroom. Dropping a match into the gasoline is going to ignite it but it’s not going to explode because it’s not all collected in one place. But the bottom line is it’s very feasible and even likely, given the evidence, that she lit the gasoline and then quickly ran into the bathroom and Shot herself.
No one would’ve shot her and then used a fire to cover up the fact that he Shot her, because we all know that a fire is not going to completely obliterate the fact that she was shot. The whole reason for the fire is to send a big old ironic F U to the fire chief husband.
Homicide victim Nanette Krentel’s sister investigated for trespassing at death site
April 12, 2019
"LACOMBE (WVUE) - The saga surrounding the murder of Nanette Krentel on the North Shore has taken a strange turn, with the St. Tammany Parish Sheriff’s Office now investigating the victim’s sister for trespassing on the site where Krentel was found slain nearly two years ago, according to our partners at NOLA.com-The Times-Picayune...."
Homicide victim Nanette Krentel’s sister investigated for trespassing at death site