most folk subscribe to the hobbs theory???
gosh that's rich.
just because the loudest voices on websleuths are pro doesn't mean their the strongest or the general consensus of the population.
just to be clear.
Precisely.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
most folk subscribe to the hobbs theory???
gosh that's rich.
just because the loudest voices on websleuths are pro doesn't mean their the strongest or the general consensus of the population.
just to be clear.
Precisely.
I only recently heard about the hair being found tangled in the shoelace belonged to TH. There is something Im curious to know and perhaps someone knows the answer. Did LE 100000% in fact confirm the said shoelace actually belong to Michaels sneakers? Or, was it just assumed it was his because that was the one used to tie him up? If not, then it would be possible for THs hair to be tangled up in his sons shoelace (but was used to tie up Michael.) Im not clear on this, so does anyone know for certain?
LE did not confirm the shoelaces even 100%. The lace(s) that tied MM was described by LE as a piece of string. SB's and MM's shoes were lace less whereas CB's cugas had one lace left in. The lace / string that was used to tie MM was not compared with the lace that was left in CB's shoe.
The two pieces of lace / string that were used to bind MM were apparently two halves of one lace. This lace appeared to be about 60 " long. All of this seems to suggest that this lace / string did not belong to the boys thus probably came from the perpetrator. It was under these two pieces of lace / string that the hair associated to TH was found.
The Laces:
https://www.jivepuppi.com/laces_and_bindings.html
The DNA Results:
https://www.jivepuppi.com/jivepuppi_DNA_part_three.html
https://www.jivepuppi.com/DNA_results_part_four.html
I only recently heard about the hair being found tangled in the shoelace belonged to TH. There is something I’m curious to know and perhaps someone knows the answer. Did LE 100000% in fact confirm the said shoelace actually belong to Michael’s sneakers? Or, was it just assumed it was his because that was the one used to tie him up? If not, then it would be possible for TH’s hair to be tangled up in his son’s shoelace (but was used to tie up Michael.) I’m not clear on this, so does anyone know for certain?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Wrong. Many people in the town of West Memphis have come to believe Hobbs is the killer of the children; more importantly the hair is more damning since a.) it would have had to survive being pulled and repulled through the laces multiple times and be submerged in water and endure several days worth of toil.....at the same time that hairs from Byers and Todd Moore were not there. That makes no sense. b.) It was found in MICHAEL'S shoelace. Michael was not Terry's son so that increases the low chances of the hair surviving for a long time were it just secondary
There was far more evidence against Terry
If Terry's hair was secondary transfer what about the hair of JMB or Todd Moore or others? Why do they go and Terry's endures? Especially since Terry claims he never saw them that day. That means it's now several days of survival for the hairs.
Also these are 8 year old boys. The hair wouldn't survive THAT much punishment while others died.
Terry's entire behavior is suspicious. He claims he was in the area around the times the murders went down yet sees nothing. He claims to see a black bum only years later. He has a history of violence against women and children and his own alibi witness contradicts him. He doesn't remember key details even though tragedy is one of the few things people DO remember with accuracy years later and he tries to use JMB as an alibi. Terry's actions scream guilty.
And if he couldn't do it because most parents who kill their kids only kill their own kids....why was byers interviewed? Todd Moore I get (his alibi is solid) but Terry was never questioned.
I can see why Byers changed.
Are you literally asking what happened to Todd's and JMB's hair? That if they found what might be TH's hair tangled in a shoelace, then two other men's hair must be there as well, or it's not a case of secondary transfer? Now there's some sound logic.
Once again, this is simply you asserting some ridiculous claim is science/fact. That's absurd.
Umm...being in an "area" and not witnessing a specific event is not even remotely relevant. I can be in an "area", and I will miss everything that occurs, save for what I am able to physically witness from my precise location.
Alibies? Let's not go there. Remember how those "alibies" turned out for WM3? They don't have one. Echols lied about his on the stand and it was ripped to shreds. Baldwin didn't even bother trying to give one. And Misskelley's wrestling story, despite how convinced you are of it, is bunkum.
People "DO" remember tragedy with accuracy years later? You are very proficient at just making things up. This is unequivocally not true.
Nonsensical.
If you were any more full of **** you'd explode like Mr Creosote
1.) Hair is not like lairs of paint. If hairs are exposed to wear and tear they'll generally ALL go ESPECIALLY if it's secondary transfer. Primary transfer is FAR more durable, and Hobbs claims he never saw the kids. If it was in a shoe tied by 8 year old boys it would probably have been destroyed or forced out long earlier. And that's not even getting into the 17 hours or so in the water. Also it isn't "might be". Hobbs all but admitted it's his, and given the man's history of violence against women and children that should set off alarm bells
2.) It was a very small area and the boys would have allegedly been screaming. And his own words placed him where the bodies where found. So no, you're being disingenuous. Terry WOULD have seen something. Also no Jessie's isn't bunk. Every single student at the practice said Jessie was always there on Wednesdays between April and June; he'd be more noticeable if he HADN'T gone. Multiple people place him in the trailer park at 6:30 (directly calling the cops liars) and several people not only claim he said "I'm going wrestling" but saw him with A WRESTLING MASK. More damningly it was a PRACTICE not an official match. So with all that....I'm inclined to believe Freddy Revelle is full of **** or misremembered. As for why they were inconsistent....these are teenagers. Bamboozling them would be childs play especially with an inexperienced attorney like Stidham.
With Jason it's the same; his alibis were teenagers who lets face it have **** memories.
3.) People remember where they were when JFK was shot; I remember where I was when 9/11 occurred (Walking into school) even though I didn't hear about the attack till 3.75 hours later. John Mark Byers remembers the details of the search a great deal (that's one of the reasons he believes Terry is guilty; Terry tried to use him as an alibi and cited an incident that never happened). Terry claims he loves his stepson dearly yet fails to remember key details and constantly acts evasive
4.) Oh horseshit. When a child dies you ALWAYS interview the parents because most of the time it's a parent or a family friend who does the deed (Richard Allen Davies being one of the exceptions). John was interviewed, so they clearly DID consider that angle and Gitchell himself admitted that you always do that. For some reason Terry was NEVER questioned until the DNA placed his beard hair in the laces used to bind the victims, and even then it was the most softball interview possible.
So no, the WMPD ****ed up by not interviewing Terry at the time of the murders.
You've said that mutiple times. I have never, ever ridiculed the handicapped. You need to stop lying. Or produce evidence. It's pathetic.this from the guy who ridiculed the handicapped.
1.) my argument is that the sheer amount of punishment and the fact that all hairs would be effected and the fact secondary transfer is by its nature less durable means that the ‘secondary transfer” argument is a crock of ****. And give that the hair has the same maternal line.....yeah it’s terry
Once again, personal attacks show your lack of a real argument, self control and maturity.2.) wow you’re an idiot. Teenagers wouldn’t have reason to remember. To them it was t a memorable day. To jmb and pam it would have been worth remembering. Damian and Jason had no reason since they didn’t do anything of note. The prosecution being better on the cross proves jack **** since Jessie described things that never happened (beating michaels face the rape etc).
Uh huh.3.) see above
4.) my point is that the cops were corrupt Hillbillies
jessie claims there was screaming. Terry would have heard and had a good chance of stumbling on it.
youre not honoring the victims. You’re *advertiser censored* on their graves
Are you literally asking what happened to Todd's and JMB's hair? That if they found what might be TH's hair tangled in a shoelace, then two other men's hair must be there as well, or it's not a case of secondary transfer? Now there's some sound logic.