LATEST EVIDENCE Discuss NEW AND DEVELOPING information here

[MagicRose99]

Now I have followed this case pretty closely and do not recall anything even remotely to do with this....clearly I am missing a big piece. Casey was given a time frame by the fictitious nanny? To do what? Enter more hot body contests and shack up with more folks??? Sorry to be disrespectful to her.

Regardless of when the meter reader first called in his tip, Caylee's decomposing body was in the trunk of the car her mother drove for the 31 days she was "missing." Not in the nanny's trunk-it was the car Casey was driving. Why do I know this? The evidence tells me.

Jose and Casey have to get the nanny into the car that Casey was driving for the days Caylee was missing-so they had better start working harder on the story.

[bolded by me]
Me either... as far as I remember, KC kept insisting that Caylee would be home by her bday - not that harm would come to her...

 

[tehcloser]

[bolded by me]
Me either... as far as I remember, KC kept insisting that Caylee would be home by her bday - not that harm would come to her...

Wasn't there something about a "31 day script" she was supposed to follow? I dunno, I am trying to remember while drinking nyquil....lol

Merry Christmas Everyone!!!

 

[reeseeva]

KC was already setting this story up in the jail visitation video with CA. CA asked her if anybody had been in the house and KC replied "she had a key, I told you that". CA then asked KC "why didn't she come back for the car". KC gave some reason for not answering, but it looked as if KC had already told CA that someone else had the car (probably Zanny, the same person who had the key to the house).

:furious: I so agree with you & have thought about this since I heard her say the nanny had a key to the house. Remember, the prosecution has to show that Casey only, had continuous use of the car! And of course now they will say the ficticious nanny had a key to the car I don't remember hearing CA asking anything about the car on the tape??, but I'm sure they will try to use this preposterous argument. What visit to the jail was this?

 

[Star12]

:furious: I so agree with you & have thought about this since I heard her say the nanny had a key to the house. Remember, the prosecution has to show that Casey only, had continuous use of the car! And of course now they will say the ficticious nanny had a key to the car I don't remember hearing CA asking anything about the car on the tape??, but I'm sure they will try to use this preposterous argument. What visit to the jail was this?

Since Casey will not testify, defense will have to produce a non-existant Zanny to testify that she had a key to the house and/or car. That tape where Casey tells Cindy that "she had a key" is not much in the way of evidence, imho, because Casey lies. And lies some more. And for what reason would the "nanny" have a key? And wouldn't Cindy have an extreme fit knowing someone else had a key to her house? Someone she didn't know, had never met nor spoken to? No Nanny, No Zanny, No key. Just another Casey lie.

 

[Tuba]

When Cindy put the question to her about the car, the prisoner was really stopped, and also stumped. There was dead air for a bit and then she said she couldn't talk about it. (One of her defense confidences) In the police interviews on July 16, KC volunteered that she hadn't abandoned the car. No one was pressing her on that point. Before that, she had described the location as just "circumstantial". It just happened to be where she ran out of gas & was helped from the off ramp onto the Amscot lot. From the parking, all of this is suspect. Her mistake here was point of view. She was obviously not speaking spontaneously or frankly but looking at the scene from an investigator's perspective. Note that she didn't talk about what she was doing but what she wasn't doing. This is another evasion from the facts that accompanies her lying. A fool's effort to second guess the line of questioning and one-up it.

 

[cuppy199]

:furious: I so agree with you & have thought about this since I heard her say the nanny had a key to the house. Remember, the prosecution has to show that Casey only, had continuous use of the car! And of course now they will say the ficticious nanny had a key to the car I don't remember hearing CA asking anything about the car on the tape??, but I'm sure they will try to use this preposterous argument. What visit to the jail was this?

Dont worry KC pretty much screwed herself by lying to the police and her friends and family. Her creditiblity went out the window.The jury will see right through that

 

[JBean]

this is turning into a general discussion thread, which makes it difficult to resurrect new discussion on one topic in the future.It is already a problem with some of the initial GD threads and subsequent threads that turned into GD threads.
So, if there is a specific topic in this thread that does not already have its own thread, please break out the discussion.