Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
MsSherlock, I think the reason for questions about the vehicle and missing seats , I am guessing that the body was transported in the vehicle and blood got on the seats and so they were removed. That is my guess. I hope that MS does testify so he can tell that Laura was murdered and it will be closure for the Babcock family. He was the one who admitted Tim Bosma was murdered. Tracy Rogers said the bones at first trial were human and she is saying it again. It proved to be true in the first trial and I am sure it is in this trial.
Are those the basement stairs of a ritzy home???
Lisa Hepfner‏
@HefCHCHNews 2m2 minutes ago
Falconer doesn't think the iPad was called Mark's iPad before the backup on July 4th but it was possible. Judge understood the name was changed upon first connection. Falconer says he can't really know that.
See, even the judge thought so. This is not good. :notgood:
Well it still stands regardless that it was SL's ipad which he loaned to Babcock. Can't change the most important feature, the serial number. And whether the name change was July 4th or January 2013, it was still in the hands of MS and/or DM and linked to DM's computer. MOO.
the picture of the burning bones did it for me. Guilty, no ifs and or buts.I have no words today.
Sorry if this has been said before but there is a drain in the floor as well, so I doubt there was ever carpet put down. MOOYes, I'll bet he *never* went down there. Ever. If you look closely at the picture.... it looks like the lowest step you can see in the picture is actually broken off. There is bare wood where the step is supposed to be, and it shows the step. I'm wondering if 'back in the day', the floor used to be covered with 'carpet'.. another 60s/70s thing? So they removed it at some point, and were too chintzy to do anything other than paint it. The picture tells us that it was definitely not polished. I guess basement finishing doesn't affect property values on that street?
Who wants to bet that DM now is going to use his famous, "you wouldn't just whip out your cell phone to take pics of Evidence would you?" line and then infer this pic taken with a cell phone cannot be reliable evidence...I think he has been leading up to this cross with each and every forensic photographer.....He makes me sick!!
Does this mean those pictures they took were "heaven sent" like his tattoo(s)?I got my answer today as to why they introduced pics of the incinerator after it was taken to OPP headquarters. They are stepping lightly in this trial. Dr Rogers did not admit to even being at the farm. She did not testify to anything found in the incinerator. All she testified to was the picture.
She could not say with certainty that they were human bones in the picture. DM will jump on this and tell ask her if they could be animal. She will say she doesn't think so but she can't say for sure.
End of cross.
So much has to be kept from this jury because of the TB case. And it appears that nothing found at that time didn't match TB and matched Laura. Considering the Eliminator was stored indoors they were lucky. Although it appears that LB was wrapped up well.
MOO
I may have this completely wrong but I have this sense that there were questions about photographs taken of the trailer parked in Kleinburg. I have a recollection of an officer or officers aggressively opening the vehicle ahead of any kind of police photographic support being on scene. I believe they took photos with cell phones as an 'official' photographer was not there. I believe they thought that Tim Bosma might be inside the van so initially it was a "rescue" operation. I can't recall if the validity of these photos was challenged during the TB trail. And, of course, there's a chance my recall of this aspect of that investigation is somewhat invalid. Anyone else remember this?:thinking:
What was the point of the testimony r.e. the blue-green van with the ramp for the wheelchair?
Must be continuity of evidence and linking it to the household. Forensics should follow.