jon_burrows
New Member
I thought JS gave JB a deadline (sometime in Feb) to come clean on the evidence he said would prove Casey didn't commit the crime. The time line came and went and I never heard another word. Did JB ever give this information? If not, why wouldn't JS enforce his order?
Tks.
Assuming that order was never modified, it would not be up to the judge to raise the issue. It would be up to the SA. Maybe the SA would rather just interpret the failure to file the disclosure as an admission that no such evidence existed.
Thanks for answering my question, I have one more concerning the subject. I keep hearing the lawyers say something like 'just for the record'. I'm assuming one of the reasons they say this is to lay the ground work if they have to appeal. Shouldn't the SA state 'for the record' that since JB never met his deadline imposed by the judge, the court concludes no evidence exists? It seems odd that JB can be given an order, not comply, then everyone seemingly ignores the non response. Couldn't JB come back later and say I had the evidence but forgot to comply and no one reminded me. It seems odd because there have been so many minor issues brought up 'for the record' but this one (IMO) is huge. He states he has evidence that his client is innocent, the judge says show it to me, then nothing?