doogiesgirl
Active Member
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2008
- Messages
- 2,377
- Reaction score
- 11
Forgive me for asking this if it has already been answered, but there are so many questions and so little time. :angel: If the SA decides to bring these letters into evidence to show conflicting statements of KC, prior knowledge of evidence that had not been released, admission of abuse, etc., how will JB be able to object or counter any of it without putting KC on the stand? It seems to me that these letters, being in the perp's handwriting, are direct testimony of hers. So, won't JB essentially have to admit everything is true or have KC take the stand and explain why it isn't? TIA!
Taking off this post in a different direction.
AZL:
Have you ever had a case or heard of a case where it was proven possible to date a person's handwriting? I am asking b/c if the SA brings in the jail letters and it is possible to date handwriting, they could also bring in the diary entry, right? Which is very damning IMO. Oh please tell me we now have this technology AZL. raying:
I don't know about you guys but the page opposite the writing in the diary, where she is kind flourishing her letters looks awfully close to the "cookie" flourishing writing that is in the jail letters. It's just an observation as we all know she wrote both, I just found it interesting and wanted to share.
Take a gander for yourselves:
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PxIJbmFwbfU[/ame]
Quick video on utube of the diary pages (you all know where to find the jail letters) It's called "When did Casey Anthony write her diary?" on you tube in case this gets shut down. I couldn't find a clear pic real quick but I know there is one.
moo