LolaMoon08
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2008
- Messages
- 7,138
- Reaction score
- 248
Because the defense neglected to test for female DNA, that could have excluded (not likely) Casey Anthony from the scene, could this be an appeals issue?
For example, what if they did test for female DNA and they found no DNA at all. Although it wouldn't exactly exclude Casey from being the one to throw Caylee out into those woods... it would still show that there is no physical evidence (except the laundry bag, duct tape, Winnie the Pooh blanket, and the trash bags) tying Casey to the scene.
But because they purposely neglected to test for female DNA at all... it makes it look like the defense, and the defendent herself, knew that if any DNA were found, it would be Casey Anthony and Caylee Anthony's DNA only. It gives the appearance that they had something to hide by not testing for female DNA.
So later on, if and when Casey is found guilty, could she claim that by not testing for female DNA (ZFG) that it hurt her chances to prove her innocence?
For example, what if they did test for female DNA and they found no DNA at all. Although it wouldn't exactly exclude Casey from being the one to throw Caylee out into those woods... it would still show that there is no physical evidence (except the laundry bag, duct tape, Winnie the Pooh blanket, and the trash bags) tying Casey to the scene.
But because they purposely neglected to test for female DNA at all... it makes it look like the defense, and the defendent herself, knew that if any DNA were found, it would be Casey Anthony and Caylee Anthony's DNA only. It gives the appearance that they had something to hide by not testing for female DNA.
So later on, if and when Casey is found guilty, could she claim that by not testing for female DNA (ZFG) that it hurt her chances to prove her innocence?