The fact that the warnings from John Bradley were
known for many months by OSCO (not the prosecutor)
and went unheeded before closing arguements IMO are HUGE!
What if KC had gotten the DP?
the masses may be cool with that but IMO it is unexcusable!
This is what I think.
Since the SAO was using chloroform/then duct tape was the murder
weapon(s) chloroform was searched
84 times!!!,
OSCO can continue to ignore it and KC can sue forcing them to re-open the case OR OSCO can re-open the case and get sued anyway.
Will OSCO will have to answer for this soon?
Will this get swept under the rug?
I am a nurse not a lawyer. What do you think?
"According to the OCSD officer, this discrepancy was known LONG before trial".
"This information was provided to the prosecution and to the OCSD in advance of the State's rebuttal, and the OCSD officer's second appearance (for the State). I even offered to fly down there overnight at my own expense to set the record straight"
http://www.cacheback.ca/news/news_release-20110711-1.asp
OSCO can continue to ignore it and KC can sue forcing them to re-open the case OR
OSCO can re-open the case and get sued anyway.
Since the SAO was using chloroform/then duct tape was the murder
weapon(s) chloroform was searched
84 times!!!,