I think it depends on whether you're able to discern subtlety. Some people, for example (maybe you're not one of them) have no idea what to do with sarcasm and take everything at face value. They are unable to determine if something is a Farce - like The Onion newspaper, for example. They are unable to process subtlety and sarcasm in the wording and photos of an article and so it's neither funny nor clever to them. They just don't get sarcasm at ll.
This label, although some may not notice, is very similar to sexualized adult women costumes that comprise the majority of female costumes on the consumer market now.
But for those who don't notice it, it's not really in the best interest of the culture (in my mind) to say the symbolism isn't there. It is, it just goes unnoticed by some people.
And the more consumers look the other way when items like this are offered for sale, the more and more obvious the sexual content will become until it's undeniable to all. It won't be a nuance anymore - it will be a photo of a child engaged in a sex act.
Best to allow those who see it in the early stages, IMHO, to speak up and be heard.