UKGuy,
You don’t make hot tea in a glass. This is what I find to be unusual.
That information is probably intentionally lost or destroyed.
JR was seldom @ home. I don’t find it usual that he missed this.
Yep, considering this case the dogs were pulled per instructions = further coverup.
I checked this book out 3 times and read it in its entirety each time. I don’t recall this reference. Do you think you could help? I’d appreciate it!
I still don’t by the extra ponytail was added before the staging took place. And JB could have worn the Barbie nightgown. It’s presence in the WC with her blood on it, is hard to explain otherwise. As we only have the pink top present and no bottoms; it would make seem logical to assume that this is what she wore that night.
I don’t believe ST had access to all the facts in this case.
Are these people still alive? I thought they were either murdered or had passed.
BDI:
Let’s keep out fingers crossed this comes to pass.
Rain on my Parade,
UKGuy,
You don’t make hot tea in a glass. This is what I find to be unusual.
It was likely used to deposit the
used teabag, although some southern folks like cold tea sipped from a glass.
More relevant is this:
Ventus Publishing Foreign Faction Who Really Kidnapped JonBenet 2012
Moreover, by the time of this interview, investigators had developed latent fingerprints on the drinking glass on the dining room table that belonged to Burke. Latent fingerprints found on the bowl of pineapple were identified as belonging to Patsy.
Burke was recognized as the tea drinker in the house, this might be germane to any fetish theory relating to Burke.
That information is probably intentionally lost or destroyed.
Sure, or just not released.
JR was seldom @ home. I don’t find it usual that he missed this.
OK, so Patsy had to know?
Yep, considering this case the dogs were pulled per instructions = further coverup.
Good point, who knows what was going on.
I checked this book out 3 times and read it in its entirety each time. I don’t recall this reference. Do you think you could help? I’d appreciate it!
No , you are right I mixed this up with the fecally soiled pajama bottoms. Although in my minds eye, I assumed he must have derived BR's account from some official police report, otherwise he is just inventing stuff.
Ventus Publishing Foreign Faction Who Really Kidnapped JonBenet 2012
There were other police reports in the files that documented what I thought could be viewed as related behavior. CSIs had written about finding a pair of pajama bottoms in JonBenét’s bedroom that contained fecal material. They were too big for her and were thought to belong to Burke.
Note the plural report
s.
Ventus Publishing Foreign Faction Who Really Kidnapped JonBenet 2012
I learned, over the course of my inquiry, that it was Burke who had actually been responsible for tearing back the paper of the presents while playing in the basement on Christmas Day, and I wondered why Patsy would claim responsibility for doing this. Patsy had also told investigators that the unwrapped box of Lego toys in the same room was being hidden for Burke’s upcoming January birthday.
I didn’t give much thought about the presence of the Christmas presents in the room at the time, but would later think these played a role in some of the events that took place on Christmas day.
Vague language from Kolar here, e.g.
I learned, must means he definitely knows stuff he cannot publicly reveal?
Ventus Publishing Foreign Faction Who Really Kidnapped JonBenet 2012
Photo 27 - Torn Christmas presents in the Wine Cellar next to the body of JonBenét. The wrapping on these presents are the same as those depicted in photographs of JonBenét and Burke in front of their Christmas tree on the morning of December 25, 1996. Source: Boulder PD Case File / Internet
I reckon Kolar is hinting here that the wine-cellar Partially Opened gifts came from upstairs, i.e. the Ramsey account about Burke's birthday is fake?
Think about it, JR or Patsy can just phone order Burke's Birthday gifts closer to his birthday?
As we only have the pink top present and no bottoms; it would make seem logical to assume that this is what she wore that night.
I'm with you on this, the rest is staging and revision, with barbie gown likely being dumped precisely because it was bloodstained, i.e. demonstrates a bedroom assault, as she was put to bed in the gown [sic].
I don’t believe ST had access to all the facts in this case.
I agree. He was stitched up. Deliberately given a job he had never undertaken before, plenty drug enforcement experience but no homicide cases.
Are these people still alive? I thought they were either murdered or had passed.
I believe so, even still practising, use your favorite search engine to cross-reference who it might be.
Also their records will be extant, unless JR get his Private Detectives to hunt them down and remove them?
BDI:
Let’s keep out fingers crossed this comes to pass.
Holly Smith is my candidate for a book on the case, she has inside information, is professional, knows where the skeletons are buried and has a score to settle with the Ramsey's?
Another curious aspect is Susan Stine reporting Doug Stine and Burke Ramsey to the police. She overheard them discussing if JonBenet had been been
manually strangled?
Get that 9-10 year old boys debating the finer points of a homicide?
Manually, only the assailant would know, unless someone else staged the assailants manual assault away?
Leaving the assailant convinced JonBenet was
manually strangled because the asailant was present!
Did Doug Stine read or hear some media reference to ligature asphyxiation somewhere?
.
